Proving Convergence of Absolute Value Sequence in Real Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if a sequence {an} converges to a in the real numbers, then the sequence of absolute values {|an|} converges to |a|. Participants explore the use of the triangle inequality and case analysis based on the sign of a. They identify three cases: when a > 0, a < 0, and a = 0, and discuss how to establish convergence in each scenario. The reverse triangle inequality is also mentioned as a potential tool, though its application raises questions about handling absolute values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly convergence of sequences.
  • Familiarity with the triangle inequality and reverse triangle inequality.
  • Knowledge of absolute values and their properties in mathematical proofs.
  • Ability to construct formal epsilon-N proofs in analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of convergence in real analysis.
  • Learn about the triangle inequality and its applications in proofs.
  • Explore case analysis techniques in mathematical proofs.
  • Investigate the properties of absolute values in the context of limits and continuity.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focused on real analysis, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of convergence and absolute value sequences.

Daveyboy
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
For a sequence in the reals

{an} converges to a, show {|an|} converges to |a|.

For any e>0 the exists an N s.t. for any n>N |an-a|<e

I want to use this inequality, but there is something funny going on. I do not know how to justify it.

|an-a|\leq||an|-|a||
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at three separate cases.

1) a> 0. Can you show that, for some N, for all n> N a_n&gt; 0? (Take \epsilon= a/2.)

2) a< 0. Can you show that, for some N, for all n> N a_n&lt; 0?

3) a= 0. Here, ||a_n|- a|= ||a_n||= |a_n|.
 
Okay I see how to break it down case wise and find N accordingly. That will work nicely.

However, I was hoping to use the reverse triangle inequality but I run into the double abs. value. It just doesn't look right to say that
for any e>0 there exists and N s.t. for any n >N

|an - a| < e
and
|an - a| \geq |an| - |a|
implies

e>||an| - |a||

but if I showed this wouldn't it be true?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K