Proving ∠D=90°-(∠A/2) in Triangle ABC with Bisectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Govind_Balaji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Geometry
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about proving that ∠D=90°-(∠A/2) in triangle ABC, participants express confusion over the problem's validity, with many arriving at the conclusion that ∠D=∠A/2 instead. They suggest that the issue may stem from a potential error in the question itself, as their calculations consistently yield the same unexpected results. Some users recommend using geometric tools like GEOGEBRA to verify their findings, while others emphasize the importance of accurate angle construction techniques. The conversation highlights the challenges of theoretical geometry and the need for precise measurements in angle bisecting. Overall, the consensus leans toward questioning the original problem's accuracy.
Govind_Balaji
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ABC is a triangle. The bisector of the exterior angle at B and the bisector of ∠C intersect each other at D. Then prove that ∠D=90°-(∠A/2)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I guess I want to prove an untrue thing because by drawing a diagram and working out I get ∠D=∠A/2. I think I have drawn it wrong by mis-understanding the question. Or the question is an error? Or did I work out wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the same result you did and I also oriented the corners of the triangle such that ABC is labelled clockwise instead (C at the top, A at the left), so the intersection point is underneath the triangle and the answer is still the same.
 
You can do a quick reality check by drawing an arbitrary triangle and constructing the bisectors and measuring the angles. Try it for several triangles.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You can do a quick reality check by drawing an arbitrary triangle and constructing the bisectors and measuring the angles. Try it for several triangles.

It seems a difficult work. Are there any thing to do with Theoretical geometry.
 
Even I tried what Simon said with a simulator called GEOGEBRA. I get the same result.
 
I get the same result as you using a + b + c = 180° = (180 - b)/2 + b + a + c/2.
 
I guess there must be a printing error in the question like may be the angles changed or like that
 
Simon Bridge said:
That would be my bet.

Aside: do you not know how to bisect and angle using a straight-edge and a compass?
http://www.mathopenref.com/constbisectangle.html

Yes I know just lazy to do that because when I miss 1° accuracy, I may get very strange results.
 
Back
Top