How Does Raising e^(2*pi*i) = 1 to the Power of 1/(2*pi*i) Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nameonascreen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation e^(2*pi*i) = 1 and the implications of raising it to the power of 1/(2*pi*i). It highlights that exponentiation rules for real numbers do not apply in the complex number plane, leading to different outcomes. Specifically, when raising 1 to this power, the result can yield multiple values due to the nature of logarithms in complex analysis. The logarithm of 1 in the complex plane can equal 2kπi for any integer k, resulting in various outputs like 1 and e. Understanding these complexities clarifies the apparent contradiction in the original statement.
nameonascreen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I saw this the other day and I don't understand how complex numbers work well enough to disprove it:

e^(2*pi*i) = 1

e^(2*pi*i)^(1/(2*pi*i)) = 1^(1/(2*pi*i))

Then the left side equals e and the right side equals 1.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you ought to learn enough about complex numbers so that you don't make a wild goose chase trying to disprove a provable true statement.

Your error lies in assuming that the rules for exponentiation that are valid for real numbers are valid for complex number.

They are not; rather, real number exponentiation is a special case of how exponentiation works in the complex number plane.
 
so e = 1 in a complex number plane?
 
No. What he is trying to say is that the rule for exponentiation \left(a^b\right)^c=a^{bc} is only valid when dealing with real numbers, a\geq 0. When you extend into the complex plane, this rule breaks down.
 
ok cool. thanks! so what really happens when you raise e^(2*pi*i) = 1 to the power of 1/(2*pi*i)?
 
nameonascreen said:
ok cool. thanks! so what really happens when you raise e^(2*pi*i) = 1 to the power of 1/(2*pi*i)?
Since 2\pi is irrational, there will be an infinite number of values. One of them, of course, will be 1.

In general, to find a^r for general complex numbers you use a^r= e^{ln(a^r)}= e^{r ln(a)}.

Here, because 1/(2\pi i)= -i/(2\pi) that would be
e^{-\frac{i}{2\pi}ln(1)}

Now, restricted to the real numbers, ln(1)= 0 so that would give e^0= 1. But in the complex numbers, ln(1)= 2k\pi i for any integer k.

That is,
1^{\frac{1}{2\pi i}}= e^{-\frac{i}{2\pi}2k\pi i}= e^k
for any integer k. Of course, k=0 gives 1, and k= 1 gives e, your two values.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top