Proving Energy-Momentum Tesor Relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter samalkhaiat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy-momentum
samalkhaiat
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
1,199
How can you go about and prove the following :
The energy-momentum tensor for any classical field theory = -2 X the functional derivative of the action with respect to the metric tensor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, if you have an action for matter interacting with gravity S = SG + SM and perform the functional derivative of S with respect to the metric tensor, you will get a first part corresponding to SG, which will be Einstein’s equations in vacuum, and a second part corresponding to SM, which will be the source of gravity. This is the covariant energy momentum tensor.
 
You are right, this is how textbooks "define" the mater field E-M tensor in GR. This was not what I asked. I wanted a proof for the following;
given any "free" matter field Lagrangian, show that the symmetric E-M tensor is equal to -2 X the functional derivative of the "free" matter action with respect to the metric tensor.(I am asking for proof with no reference to gravity). thanks.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top