Proving Equations: cscθ - cotθ = (cscθ + cotθ)^-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equivalence of the equations cscθ - cotθ and (cscθ + cotθ)^{-1}. Participants suggest rewriting the right side as 1/(cscθ + cotθ) and manipulating it to show it equals cscθ - cotθ. There is a debate about terminology, emphasizing that equations can be equivalent but not equal. Several users recommend using sine and cosine for simplification, leading to a clearer proof. Ultimately, the consensus is that multiplying the two sides together yields a result of 1, confirming their equivalence.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
I am trying to prove that the equations below equal each other.

## (cscθ - cotθ) = (cscθ + cotθ)^{-1} ##

Besides letting the two sides equal each other, I have not been able to simplify each side independently to find the equivalent expression. I've had to remove terms from either side by multiplying each side simultaneously, but if anyone could show me how to do this proof one equation at a time, then that would be great!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just multiply them together and note that the result is 1. That is sufficient.
 
MathewsMD said:
I am trying to prove that the equations below equal each other.

## (cscθ - cotθ) = (cscθ + cotθ)^{-1} ##

Besides letting the two sides equal each other, I have not been able to simplify each side independently to find the equivalent expression. I've had to remove terms from either side by multiplying each side simultaneously, but if anyone could show me how to do this proof one equation at a time, then that would be great!
Write the right side as 1/(cscθ + cotθ) which can be rewritten as
$$ \frac{1}{\frac{1}{sinθ} + \frac{cosθ}{sinθ}}$$
A bit more work shows that the last expression above is equal to cscθ - cotθ.

A quibble with your first sentence, above. One equation does not "equal" another. Equations can be equivalent (meaning they have exactly the same solution set), but never equal to one another.
 
jgens said:
Just multiply them together and note that the result is 1. That is sufficient.
Did you misread the question? Multiplying them together gives
\frac{csc(\theta)- cot(\theta)}{csc(\theta)+ cot(\theta)}
which can be shown to be equal to 1 but is not obviously so. Did you miss the sign change?

With problems of this kind I almost automatically change to "sine" and "cosine".
csc(\theta)- cot(\theta)= \frac{1}{sin(\theta}- \frac{cos(\theta)}{sin(\theta)}
= \frac{1- cos(\theta)}{sin(\theta)}
Multiply both numerator and denominator by 1+ cos(\theta):
= \frac{1- cos^2(\theta)}{sin(\theta)(1+ cos(\theta))}
 
HallsofIvy said:
Did you misread the question?

Nope. My suggestion: (csc(x)-cot(x))(csc(x)+cot(x)) = csc2(x)-cot2(x) = csc2(x)(1-cos2(x)) = csc2(x)sin2(x) = 1. It seemed like the most straight-forward solution to me.

Did you miss the sign change?

Again no.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top