Proving Equilibrium in a System of Forces Using Moment Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter kirab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment Statics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving equilibrium in a system of forces using moment equations. Participants are tasked with writing and analyzing moment equations about points A, B, and C in a mechanical system, exploring the relationships between forces and moments to demonstrate equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents moment equations about points A, B, and C, questioning their equality and suggesting that pin supports may not create moments.
  • Another participant clarifies that Cx and Cy do create moments about points A and B, emphasizing that A and B are not pin supports but rather ends of a member that rotates about point C.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding their derived equations for summation of forces in the x and y directions, questioning the equality of two expressions for P.
  • Further contributions indicate that the participant's confusion stemmed from an incorrect assumption about the orientation of their coordinate system based on a rotated diagram.
  • One participant suggests that solving for Cx and Cy in terms of P could simplify the equations and clarify their equality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of forces at the supports and the correctness of derived equations. There is no consensus on the resolution of the equations or the interpretation of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding based on diagram orientation and assumptions about force directions, which may affect their calculations and interpretations.

kirab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Diagram is attached.

P = forces
M = free-moving moment
C = looks like a pin connection
L = distance between A and C, and C and B

With the system in equilibrium.

Question: Write the moment equations about point A, B and C and prove that they are all the same.

so basically I end up with:

(Counter-clockwise moment is positive.)

Summation of moments about point A: P(sin(90-theta))(2L) - M - Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) = 0

point B: P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) - M = 0

point C: P(sin(90-theta))(L) - M + P(sin(theta))(L) = 0

which means that

P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) = P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) = P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L) = M.

I don't see how these can be equal. Any mistakes seen here in the approach to solving this problem? Maybe pin supports Cx, Cy don't create moments?

Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Tut#3Q#2.jpg
    Tut#3Q#2.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post homework questions in the homework section of PF.
 
Your attempt is excellent. Cx and Cy (at the support point C) do create moments about B or A. A and B are not pin suppports, they are just the ends of the member that rotates about C under the applied forces and couple, until equilibrium is reached. Note that by applying the equilibrium equations sum of Fx = 0 and sum of Fy = 0, you can solve for Cx and Cy in terms of P. That will greatly simplify the equations in a manner that will clarify their equality.
 
Sorry for posting in the wrong sub-forum :(

Thanks for the help!

My issue is: when I do summation of forces in x and y, I get

P = (Cy(cos(theta)) + Cx(sin(theta)))/(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) from sum of Fx and

P = -(Cx(cos(theta))+Cy(sin(theta)))/(sin(theta)-cos(theta)).

Which I'm not sure if they're equal?

Either way, I plugged the 1st P into
P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L)

(all equal to M, this is the last line of my initial post)

When I plugged P into those, I got a huge mess that doesn't clarify the equality. Any tips?

Thanks
 
kirab said:
Sorry for posting in the wrong sub-forum :(

Thanks for the help!

My issue is: when I do summation of forces in x and y, I get

P = (Cy(cos(theta)) + Cx(sin(theta)))/(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) from sum of Fx and

P = -(Cx(cos(theta))+Cy(sin(theta)))/(sin(theta)-cos(theta)).

Which I'm not sure if they're equal?

Either way, I plugged the 1st P into
P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L)

(all equal to M, this is the last line of my initial post)

When I plugged P into those, I got a huge mess that doesn't clarify the equality. Any tips?

Thanks
I am not sure from where you are getting your sum of Fx and Fy equations. Cx and the upper P are the only 2 forces in the x direction, and Cy and the lower P are the only 2 forces in the y direction. So in the x direction, you have Cx -P =0, and in the y direction, you have Cy -P = 0. Solve for Cx and Cy.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I am not sure from where you are getting your sum of Fx and Fy equations. Cx and the upper P are the only 2 forces in the x direction, and Cy and the lower P are the only 2 forces in the y direction. So in the x direction, you have Cx -P =0, and in the y direction, you have Cy -P = 0. Solve for Cx and Cy.

OH! Yeah My sum of Fx and Fy came from looking at my altered diagram... which had the member lying horizontally, so I stupidly assumed that the x-coordinate system was horizontal and that the y-coordinate system was perpendicular to that, simply from looking at my diagram which has been rotated :P

Yes, with that P = Cx = Cy equation, it can be easily shown that sum of Ma = sum of Mb = sum of Mc. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K