Proving Even Divisibility of p^2-1 for Primes p≥5 in Number Theory

camilus
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
number theory problem

For every prime p \ge 5, prove that p^2-1 is evenly divisible by 24(gives an integer answer).


Example: for p=5, {5^2-1 \over 24} = 1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that p^2 - 1 = (p - 1)(p + 1). If p is prime, try to examine how p - 1 and p +1 divide by 2, 3 and 4.
 
woah, that's pretty neat, except for the 4 part you practically solved it it one setence. I'm finishing up my proof using modular arithmemtic.
 
I see, your proof would say: for every prime p \ge 5, there is a k such that k is equal to to the integer remainder after the 2*2*2*3 have been canceled out:

k={p^2-1 \over 24} = {(p+1)(p-1) \over 24} = {(\text {even no.} \ge 6 = 2*3)(\text {even no.} \ge 4=2*2) \over 2*3*2*2}

so for example 7, would be

k={7^2-1 \over 24} = {(7+1)(7-1) \over 24} = {(8)(6) \over 2*2*2*3} = {2*2*2*2*3 \over 2*2*2*3} = 2

My proof uses modular arithmetic, and mine simply says that for every prime p \le 5,

p^2 \equiv 1 \text{ } (\text{mod }24)

so for example, for p=11

11^2 = 121

121 \equiv 1 \text{ } (\text{mod }24)

using modular arithmetic, we would read this as (121-1) is a multiple of 24, and indeed 120/24=5
 
A theorem that might be useful is that every odd prime squared is congruent to 1 Mod 8. (In fact, every odd integer.)

Proof: The integer is of the form 4n+r, where r is either 1 or 3. Then (4n+r)^2 = 16n^2+8n+r^2 = 8(M)+r^2. but r^2 = 1 or r^2 = 9.
 
Last edited:
yeah, that's another proof. my proof can be directly deduced from yours.

since you said for every odd prime squared,

p^2 \equiv 1 \text{ } (\text{mod }8)

then mine directly follows as every odd prime squared, p>3, then

p^2 \equiv 1 \text{ } (\text{mod }8*3)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top