Proving Fluid Flow Velocity & Vorticity Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a fluid flow equation involving velocity and vorticity, specifically the relationship between the convective derivative of velocity and the vorticity vector. The subject area is fluid dynamics, focusing on the mathematical representation of fluid motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct notation for the equation and the use of subscript notation. Some suggest expanding expressions and applying product rules, while others express uncertainty about how to proceed with the expansion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding notation and potential starting points for expansion, but there is no explicit consensus on the method to be used.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding notation and the need for clarity in expressing the equations. Participants are also grappling with the mathematical techniques required to manipulate the expressions involved.

Fairy111
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a fluid flow of velocity u and vorticity w=∆ x u, show that:

(u. ∆ )u=-u x w + ∆(1/2|u|²)

Sorry the triangles should be the other way up!




Homework Equations



∆(u.v)=(u.∆)v + (v.∆)u +u x (∆ x v) + v x (∆ x u )



The Attempt at a Solution


I need to show this using subscipt notation, but am really stuck, any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here's how you write it correctly in tex - click it on the tex to see the expression
(u \cdot \nabla )u=-u \times w + \nabla (\frac{1}{2}|u|^2)

i would start by trying to expanding one of the expressions in your equation, use the equations and product rule expansions

by subscript notation do you mean like:
\textbf{u} \cdot \textbf{w} = u_i v_i

\textbf{u} \times \textbf{w} = u_i v_j \epsilon_{ijk}
 
Last edited:
I don't know how to expand the expression...Sorry I am really not very good at this area of maths.

but yes that is what i mean by subscript notation.
 
have a crack, I'm not just going to do it for you - how about starting with u x w?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K