Proving from first principles that a(n)^2 -> 4 if a(n) -> 2.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tommy941
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Sequences
Tommy941
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let an → 2. Prove from first principles (i.e. give a direct ε-N proof) that an2 → 4.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried considering |an-2|2 and considering that |an2-4| = |(an+2)(an-2)| but I could not get either of these methods to work. Would someone be able to point me in the right direction?
I was thinking maybe one of the sequences is a subsequence of the other?

I was also wondering, is this true generally that if a sequence tends to L then the sequence squared will tend to L2?

Thanks,
Tommy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given that, for \epsilon> 0, there exist N such that is n> N, |a_n-2|< \epsilon (since a_n goes to 2).

Now, you want |a_n^2- 4|= |a_n+ 2||a_n- 2|< \epsilon. If you can find an upper bound, A, on |a_n+ 2| then you can say that |a_n+ 2||a_n- 2|< A|a_n- 2| so that if A|a_n- 2|< \epsilon, which is the same as |x_n- 2|< \epsilon/A, then |a_n+ 2||a_n- 2|< A|a_n- 2|< \epsilon.

Now, if a_n is close to 2, say, |a_n- 2|< 1, what can you say about |a_n+ 2|?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Start with something like :
There exists a delta such that if |an-2|<delta, then (an-2)^2 < epsilon.
Then notice that (an+2) = (an-2)+4.
I think those are the main techniques in this proof.
 
Thanks HallsofIvyy I think I will be able to do it now. Is it O.K for me to say that for suitably large n, |an-2|<ε<1 ⇒ |an+2|<3 so 3 can be considered an upper bound on an when n is suitably large??
 
Yes, that will work.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top