Proving Horizontal Component of Tension in Stationary Chain

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoyalCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the horizontal component of tension in a stationary chain strung between two vertical walls. It is established that the horizontal component of tension remains constant throughout the chain due to equilibrium conditions. The tension at points A and B is calculated as T_A = T_B = mg/(2sin(θ)), with extreme cases analyzed where θ approaches 0 and π/2, leading to infinite tension and a limit of mg/2, respectively. The reasoning provided is confirmed as sound, with minor corrections noted regarding the vertical component of tension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in physics
  • Knowledge of tension forces in a uniform rope
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and limits
  • Basic principles of mechanics related to forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in greater detail
  • Explore the concept of tension in non-uniform ropes
  • Learn about the applications of trigonometric limits in physics problems
  • Investigate the behavior of forces in systems with multiple constraints
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of tension in stationary systems.

RoyalCat
Messages
670
Reaction score
2
I'd just like some confirmation on my answers, and I'd appreciate it if someone could take the time to explain why what I did is right. I solved it with a lot of hand-waving, so I'm very unsure of how I reached the answers.

A uniform chain of weight [tex]W[/tex] is strung between two vertical walls. The chain makes an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] below the horizontal at points A and B, both of which are of equal height, one on each wall.

The lowest point of the chain is denoted as point [tex]P[/tex]

A. Prove that the horizontal component of the tension in the chain is the same along every point in the chain.
B. Calculate the tension in the chain at the points A and B.
C. Consider the extreme cases where:
i. [tex]\theta \rightarrow 0[/tex]
ii. [tex]\theta \rightarrow \tfrac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

My answers:

I chose to look at the chain as a uniform rope. We weren't told anything about its length or internal structure, so it seems like a reasonable way to treat it.

A. Let's consider a small segment of the chain (Not an infinitesimal one). Gravity acts through its center of mass, there is a tension outwards (For the sake of discussion, up and right) from the top of the segment, and a tension going down and left from the bottom of the segment.
The only forces acting horizontally are the horizontal components of the two tension forces, and since the segment of the chain is at rest, then these two components must be equal.
As we chose a nondescript section of the chain, with the tensions acting on different points on the chain, from this we can conclude that the horizontal component of the tension is uniform across the chain.

B. Symmetry allows us to refer to just half the chain. We know the vertical (Thanks Mapes!) component of the tension at point A has to be equal to [tex]\tfrac{mg}{2}[/tex]
[tex]T\sin{\theta}=\tfrac{mg}{2}[/tex]
[tex]T_A=T_B=\tfrac{mg}{2\sin{\theta}}[/tex]

C.
i. [tex]\theta \rightarrow 0[/tex]
The tension explodes. You would need infinite tension force to keep the chain that taught.
This makes perfect sense, since a purely horizontal force cannot counter-balance a vertical one.
ii. [tex]\theta \rightarrow \tfrac{\pi}{2}[/tex]
The limit is [tex]\tfrac{mg}{2}[/tex]
The two walls would have to be touching, but then A and B each would just support half the weight of the chain. Practically, we're just looping the chain and connecting both ends to one point.

I've got this irking sensation that my thinking is flawed somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I like your reasoning on part A.

RoyalCat said:
We know the horizontal component of the tension at point A has to be equal to [tex]\tfrac{mg}{2}[/tex]

You mean "vertical" here, right?

Everything else looks good to me.
 
Mapes said:
I like your reasoning on part A.



You mean "vertical" here, right?

Everything else looks good to me.

Whoops, that is correct. Thanks for catching it and for reviewing my work. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K