Proving Identity of S12^2 in Two Particle System

evilcman
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
I am trying to prove the identity
S_{12} ^ 2 = 4S^2-2S_{12}
where S12 is the tensor operator:
S_{12} = 3(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r}) / r^2 - (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2})
where sigmas are vectors made of the Pauli matrices in the space of particle 1 and 2, and
\vec{S} = (\vec{\sigma_1} + \vec{\sigma_2})/2
the spin of the two particle system, and I am using the identity:
(\vec{a} \vec{\sigma})(\vec{b} \vec{\sigma}) = \vec{a}\vec{b} + i \sigma (\vec{a} X \vec{b})
to match the terms in each sides, however, i get a term like:
(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{n})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{n})(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2}) = 1 + i (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{n}) (\vec{n}(\vec{\sigma_1} X \vec{\sigma_2}))
and I don't know how to further simplify this, but if the identity really holds, then this should be a linear combination of 1, \vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2} and (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{n}) (\vec{\sigma_2}\vec{n}), where n is a vec{r} / r. So, how do I further simplify this? Or is there an easier way to prove this without tedious computation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The identity you are trying to prove can be proven by using the definition of the S12 tensor operator. Since S12 is defined as 3(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r}) / r^2 - (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2}), we can simply expand the left side of the equation and substitute the definition of S12 for the right side. On the left side, we have S12 squared: S_{12} ^ 2 = (3(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r}) / r^2 - (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2}))^2 = 9(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})^2 (\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r})^2 /r^4 - 6(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2}) / r^2 + (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2})^2 On the right side, we have 4S^2-2S_{12}: 4S^2-2S_{12} = 4((\vec{\sigma_1} + \vec{\sigma_2})^2/4) - 2(3(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})(\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r}) / r^2 - (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2})) = 3(\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{r})^2 (\vec{\sigma_2} \vec{r})^2 /r^4 - (\vec{\sigma_1} \vec{\sigma_2})^2 As you can see, both sides of the equation have the same terms (up to a factor of 9/4 on the
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top