Proving Integral of an Irrational Function

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the integral of the function √(a² - x²) with respect to x. Participants suggest using trigonometric substitution, specifically letting x = a sin(t), to simplify the integration process. There is a debate on how to justify the choice of the positive or negative root during substitution, with the consensus being that x represents a length and should be non-negative. Additionally, one participant mentions that differentiating the provided formula could serve as a proof. The conversation emphasizes understanding the constraints of the integral, particularly the condition |x| ≤ |a|.
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Homework Statement


(From an Integration Table)
Prove,
<br /> {\int}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}{dx} = {{\frac {1}{2}}{\left(}{{{x}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}} + {{{a}^{2}}{\arcsin{\frac {x}{a}}}}}{\right)}}{,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{{{|}{x}{|}}{\leq}{{|}{a}{|}}}<br />

Homework Equations


Knowledge of Trigonometric Substitution for Integration ("Backwards" and "Forwards").

Knowledge of integration techniques involving the form,
<br /> {\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}<br />

Integration by Parts (IBP),
<br /> {\int}{d{\left[}{u(x)}{v(x)}{\right]}} = {\int}{\biggl[}{u(x)}{d[v(x)]} + {v(x)}{d[u(x)]}{\biggl]}<br />

<br /> {\int}{u(x)}{d[v(x)]} = {{u(x)}{v(x)}} - {\int}{v(x)}{d[u(x)]}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


What is bothering me about this integral is that I do not have a {x} term on the outside of the radical which is preventing from evaluating this integral by normal convention.

Let,
<br /> {I} = {\int}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}{dx}<br />

In applying trigonometric substitution - consider the right triangle,
327047_Trigonometry.JPG


So,
<br /> {{a}{\sin{\theta}}} = {\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}<br />

Solving by "forward" substitution,
<br /> {x} = {\pm}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}}{{\cos}^{2}{\theta}}}}<br />

However, how would you justify which root to take: the positive one or the negative one?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would justify it by arguing that x is the length of a side of a triangle, which is a non-negative quantity.
 
I'm pretty sure all you have to do is...

x = a sin(t)
dx = a cos(t) dt

I = a S sqrt(1 - sin^2 t) * a cos(t) dt = a^2 S cos^2 t dt

Now just use a double-angle identity to evaluate the integral and then perform the appropriate substitutions to get back to the solution to the original problem. Not too bad...
 
Since you are given the integration formula and asked to prove it, you could just differentiate. And, of course, the given formula is defined only for |x|\le|a|.
 
Yeah, that's what I was originally thinking too, HallsOfIvy. But does that count as proof? I guess it should. huh.
 
Hey,

e(ho0n3 said:
I would justify it by arguing that x is the length of a side of a triangle, which is a non-negative quantity.

Ok, that makes sense - I kind of thought that reasoning as well. Thanks.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K