Proving Inverse Matrices: Simplifying the Last Step

  • Thread starter Thread starter swuster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrices
swuster
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show that a given matrix is the inverse of the other, by showing that multiplying them together generates the identity matrix. I can't see a way to simplify the last step and I feel like I'm missing something..? Any input on this would be helpful. Thanks!

Homework Equations


see below
j = sqrt(-1)

The Attempt at a Solution


ece2200.jpg

How do I prove that the rest of the terms are 0?
 

Attachments

  • ece2200.jpg
    ece2200.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like the last sentence, which you cut off at the comma, might give you a hint. What does it say?
 
It's not cut off. It's as far as I have gotten with the proof, haha. There is nothing obvious that jumps out at me when I consider the case where the exponential argument isn't 0.
 
Try using

\sum_{m=0}^{M-1} z^m = \frac{1 - z^{M}}{1 - z}

which holds for any complex number z \neq 1.
 
Thanks so much! That did the trick!

finishedproof.jpg
 
swuster said:
Thanks so much! That did the trick!

finishedproof.jpg

Looks good, nice job.

It's also insightful to consider what is going on geometrically.

This sum:

\sum_{i=0}^{M-1}\frac{1}{M}e^{j\left(\frac{2\pi(\lambda-\kappa)i}{M}\right)

is calculating the average of M complex numbers. Furthermore, since \lambda - \kappa is a nonzero integer, these complex numbers are evenly spaced samples around the unit circle, so their average is zero.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top