Proving Linear Dependence of Trig Functions on the Real Line

misterau
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show {cos x ,sin x , cos 2x , sin 2x , (cos x − sin x)^2 − 2*sin^2( x)} is not a linearly independent set of real valued functions on the real line R.

The Attempt at a Solution


Not linearly independent = linearly dependent?
So if
f(x) = cos (x)
g(x) = sin (x)
m(x) = cos (2*x) = 1 - 2sin^2(x)
k(x) = sin (2*x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)
h(x) = (cos (x) − sin (x))^2 − 2*sin^2(x)

z(x) = (a*f(x)) + (b*g(x)) + (c*m(x)) + (d*k(x)) + (e*h(x))

To prove it is linearly dependence we need scalars a,b,c,d,e that work with ANY x that make the equation z(x) equal to zero? Some of the scalars can be zero correct? Just not all of them then it becomes an non trivial answer.

For instance:

0=1 * 2sin(x)cos(x) + -1 * (1 - 2sin^2(x) ) + 1 *( cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) - 2sin(x)cos(x) - 2sin^2(x) ) + 0 * cos(x) + 0 * sin(x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
misterau said:

Homework Statement


show {cos x ,sin x , cos 2x , sin 2x , (cos x − sin x)^2 − 2*sin^2( x)} is not a linearly independent set of real valued functions on the real line R.

The Attempt at a Solution


Not linearly independent = linearly dependent?
Yes, that is correct.

So if
f(x) = cos (x)
g(x) = sin (x)
m(x) = cos (2*x) = 1 - 2sin^2(x)
k(x) = sin (2*x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)
h(x) = (cos (x) − sin (x))^2 − 2*sin^2(x)
?? m, k, and h are not among the functions you give initially. Is this a different example?

z(x) = (a*f(x)) + (b*g(x)) + (c*m(x)) + (d*k(x)) + (e*h(x))

To prove it is linearly dependence we need scalars a,b,c,d,e that work with ANY x that make the equation z(x) equal to zero? Some of the scalars can be zero correct? Just not all of them then it becomes an non trivial answer.
Yes.

For instance:

0=1 * 2sin(x)cos(x) + -1 * (1 - 2sin^2(x) ) + 1 *( cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) - 2sin(x)cos(x) - 2sin^2(x) ) + 0 * cos(x) + 0 * sin(x)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top