Proving Measurability and Integrability of a Function on a Product Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funky1981
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurable
Funky1981
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f : (0,1) —>R be measurable( w.r.t. Lebesgue measure) function in L1((0,1)). Define the function g on (0,1)× (0,1) by

g(x,y)=f(x)/x if 0<y<x<1
g(x,y)=0 if 0<x≤y<1

Prove:
1) g is measurable function (w.r.t. Lebesgue measure in the prodcut (0,1)× (0,1)

2)g is integrable in (0,1)× (0,1)

Homework Equations



I tried to think about the product space but it is not really obvious for me how to begin, Can anyone give me suggestions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing this:

Let ##(\Omega,\mathcal{B})## is a set with ##\sigma##-algebra.
Let ##A,B\in \mathcal{B}## disjoint, define ##\chi_A## and ##\chi_B## the indicator functions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicator_function#Definition
Let ##f:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## and ##g:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## be measurable.

Define ##h:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## by

h = f\chi_A + g\chi_B

Show that ##h## is measurable.

Use this to show (1).
 
micromass said:
Start by showing this:

Let ##(\Omega,\mathcal{B})## is a set with ##\sigma##-algebra.
Let ##A,B\in \mathcal{B}## disjoint, define ##\chi_A## and ##\chi_B## the indicator functions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicator_function#Definition
Let ##f:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## and ##g:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## be measurable.

Define ##h:\Omega\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## by

h = f\chi_A + g\chi_B

Show that ##h## is measurable.

Use this to show (1).

So if I take A to be 0<y<x<1, B to be 0<x≤y<1 and construct h = f\chi_A + g\chi_B
consider set {x| h(x)> a} if it is in A then we have h= f then f measurable implies h measurable, is my construction right?
 
Funky1981 said:
So if I take A to be 0<y<x<1, B to be 0<x≤y<1 and construct h = f\chi_A + g\chi_B
consider set {x| h(x)> a} if it is in A then we have h= f then f measurable implies h measurable, is my construction right?

In my post, we had ##A\in \Omega## and ##f## had ##\Omega## as domain.
Now, here is the slight technical issue that ##A\subseteq (0,1)^2##, but this is not the domain of ##f##. So you need to solve this.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top