Proving Metric Space: (X,\bar\rho) is Positive Definite

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that if (X, ρ) is a metric space, then (X, ρ̅) is also a metric space, specifically focusing on the positive definiteness of the metric ρ̅ defined as ρ̅(x, y) = ρ(x, y) / (1 + ρ(x, y)). Participants are also exploring the continuity of functions between metric spaces with respect to different metrics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the positive definiteness of ρ̅, questioning whether it is sufficient to rely on the properties of ρ. There are attempts to relate the continuity of functions between metric spaces (X, ρ) and (Y, θ) to the metrics ρ and ρ̅, with some participants expressing uncertainty about how to represent open sets in the context of ρ̅.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the metrics and the conditions for continuity, while others are still clarifying their understanding of open sets and neighborhoods under the different metrics. The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the need to show continuity with respect to different metrics and the implications of the definitions of open sets in the context of the metric ρ̅. There is also a focus on the axioms of metric spaces and the properties that must be satisfied.

boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if (X,\rho)is a metric space then so is (X,\bar\rho), where
<br /> \bar\rho:X \times X \Rightarrow R_{0}^{+}, (x,y) \Rightarrow \frac{\rho(x,y)}{1+\rho(x,y)}.<br />


Homework Equations



I'm trying to prove the axiom that a metric space is positive definite.


The Attempt at a Solution



because given (X,\rho) is a metric space is it enough to say that (X,\bar\rho), cannot be &lt; 0 because (X,\rho) cannot be &lt; 0 ? ie the limit of (X,\bar\rho) is 0 as (X,\rho) tends to zero ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if x is not y, then <br /> \bar\rho<br /> is greater than 0 since <br /> \rho<br /> is greater than 0 for this case.
If x=y, then it is clear that <br /> \bar\rho<br /> is 0 as you have <br /> \rho(x,x)<br /> <br /> = 0 in the numerator.
 
Thanks for your help.

I have also got to prove the following
Let (Y, \theta) be a metric space. Prove the following.
f : X \rightarrow Y is continuous with respect to \bar\rho if and only if it is continuous with respect to \rho


I know I have to show that the inverse of Open sets in Y are open in X and visa versa how ever I'm not sure how to represent the open sets in \bar\rho

ie if I was proving (X,\rho) and (Y,\theta)

I would show that for each G \subseteq Y that f^{-1}(G)is an open \subseteq X whenever G isan open subset of Y




As the metric space \bar\rho uses the metric \rho how to I incorporate that into the proof ?
 
Let f be continuous wrt <br /> \rho<br /> and let G be open in Y. Then, as you pointed out, <br /> f^{-1}(G) <br /> is open in X. Let a be a point in <br /> f^{-1}(G) <br /> = A. Then, A is open in X implies that neighborhoods of a are in A (under the rho metric). Write out what these neighborhoods look like. They look like {y | ||a-y||<br /> \rho<br /> < e }, and these neighborhoods are in X. Now what do the neighborhoods look like under the <br /> \bar\rho<br /> metric and how do they relate to the usual neighborhoods?
 
Does this look alright ?
I've tried to use Open balls of radius \delta and \psi



So I have three metric spaces

(X,\rho)
(X,\bar\rho)
and
(Y, \theta)
and a function
f : X \rightarrow Y
which is continuous wrt (X,\rho)

So given f : X \rightarrow Ycontinous wrt \rho.

Take a neighbourhood B_{\rho}(a,\delta) = {x \in X \mid \rho(x,a) &lt; \delta }

Then for each \epsilon &gt; 0<br /> there is an \delta &gt; 0


Such that we have B_{\rho}(a,\delta) \leq \theta(f(x),f(a)) &lt; \epsilon As f is continuous



To show that f : X \rightarrow Y is continuous wrt \bar\rho we need to to find a B_{\rho}(b,\psi) \subset B_{\rho}(a,\delta)

So we can take \psi = \delta - \rho(b,a)

if
\rho(x,b) &lt; \psi
then
\rho(x,a) \leq \rho(x,b)+\rho(x,a)
\rho(x,a) &lt; \psi+ \delta - \psi = \delta

So we can know show that:
f : X \rightarrow Y is continuous wrt \bar\rho

0 &lt; B_{\bar\rho}(x,\psi) &lt; \rho(f(x),f(b)) \leq B_{\rho}(a,\delta) \leq \theta(f(x),f(a)) &lt; \epsilon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K