Proving modified Maxwell action is gauge invariant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the gauge invariance of a modified Maxwell action under the transformation of the vector potential, specifically examining the implications of the transformation on the action's terms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the invariance of the action under gauge transformations, questioning the conditions under which certain terms vanish or can be treated as divergences. There is a focus on the mathematical manipulation of terms involving the Levi-Civita symbol and derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the terms involved and the conditions for applying the divergence theorem. There is a recognition that the integrand does not need to be strictly invariant, but rather invariant up to a divergence term.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering boundary conditions and the behavior of fields at infinity, which may influence the applicability of certain mathematical techniques in proving gauge invariance.

DaniV
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider the quantum field modified Maxwell action in 2 + 1 dimensions:
##S=\int (-\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}+\frac {\theta}{2}\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu})\,d^3x##
when ##\theta## is dimensionful constant and ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}## Levi-Civita symbol
Show that this action is gauge invariant.
Relevant Equations
##F^{\mu\nu}=\partial^\mu A^\nu-\partial^\nu A^\mu##
gauge transformation: ##A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial ^\mu \chi## when ##\chi## is scalar function.
I want to show that the action staying the same action after taking ##A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial ^\mu \chi##, for the first term I suceeded in showing the invariance using the fact ##[\partial ^ \mu , \partial ^\nu]=0## but for the second term I'm getting: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu} \to \epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu} +\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi )F_{\mu\nu} ## so I don'`t understand how to show the last step: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi) F_{\mu\nu}=0##

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaniV said:
how to show the last step: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi) F_{\mu\nu}=0##
This expression will not equal zero, in general.

In order for the action to be invariant under the transformation, it is not necessary that the integrand of the action integral be invariant. It is sufficient for the integrand to be invariant up to a divergence term. Using the divergence theorem, the integral of the divergence term will equal zero if the fields vanish at infinity sufficiently rapidly.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
TSny said:
This expression will not equal zero, in general.

In order for the action to be invariant under the transformation, it is not necessary that the integrand of the action integral be invariant. It is sufficient for the integrand to be invariant up to a divergence term. Using the divergence theorem, the integral of the divergence term will equal zero if the fields vanish at infinity sufficiently rapidly.
how to show that this expression is a total derivative so we can use divergence theorem, I tried to do integration by parts and I got:
##\int \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi )F_{\mu\nu}\, d^3x = \oint \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu} \chi F_{\mu\nu} d\vec S ## ##+\int \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu} \chi (\partial_\alpha F_{\mu\nu})\, d^3x ##
the first term of integration is zero due to boundary condition but the second one is not total derivative because ##\chi ## is outside the derivative..
 
Last edited:
Write out the second one in terms of the 4-vector potential ##A##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaniV

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K