Proving modified Maxwell action is gauge invariant

DaniV
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider the quantum field modified Maxwell action in 2 + 1 dimensions:
##S=\int (-\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}+\frac {\theta}{2}\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu})\,d^3x##
when ##\theta## is dimensionful constant and ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}## Levi-Civita symbol
Show that this action is gauge invariant.
Relevant Equations
##F^{\mu\nu}=\partial^\mu A^\nu-\partial^\nu A^\mu##
gauge transformation: ##A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial ^\mu \chi## when ##\chi## is scalar function.
I want to show that the action staying the same action after taking ##A^\mu \to A^\mu + \partial ^\mu \chi##, for the first term I suceeded in showing the invariance using the fact ##[\partial ^ \mu , \partial ^\nu]=0## but for the second term I'm getting: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu} \to \epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}A_\alpha F_{\mu\nu} +\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi )F_{\mu\nu} ## so I don'`t understand how to show the last step: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi) F_{\mu\nu}=0##

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaniV said:
how to show the last step: ##\epsilon^{\alpha\mu\nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi) F_{\mu\nu}=0##
This expression will not equal zero, in general.

In order for the action to be invariant under the transformation, it is not necessary that the integrand of the action integral be invariant. It is sufficient for the integrand to be invariant up to a divergence term. Using the divergence theorem, the integral of the divergence term will equal zero if the fields vanish at infinity sufficiently rapidly.
 
TSny said:
This expression will not equal zero, in general.

In order for the action to be invariant under the transformation, it is not necessary that the integrand of the action integral be invariant. It is sufficient for the integrand to be invariant up to a divergence term. Using the divergence theorem, the integral of the divergence term will equal zero if the fields vanish at infinity sufficiently rapidly.
how to show that this expression is a total derivative so we can use divergence theorem, I tried to do integration by parts and I got:
##\int \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu}(\partial_\alpha \chi )F_{\mu\nu}\, d^3x = \oint \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu} \chi F_{\mu\nu} d\vec S ## ##+\int \epsilon^{\alpha \mu \nu} \chi (\partial_\alpha F_{\mu\nu})\, d^3x ##
the first term of integration is zero due to boundry condition but the second one is not total derivative because ##\chi ## is outside the derivative..
 
Last edited:
Write out the second one in terms of the 4-vector potential ##A##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top