Proving Module Homomorphisms: A x B to M & M to A x B

JdotAckdot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If you can help, that would be great.

Let R be a commutative ring, and A,B,M be R-modules. Prove:

a) HomR(A x B, M) is isomorphic to HomR(A, M) x HomR(B, M)
b) HomR(M, A x B) is isomorphic to HomR(M, A) x HomR(M, B)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
step one: try to write down a map from one to the other.

e.g. given a pair of homomorphisms f:M-->A and g:M-->B. how would you construct, in the simplest most natural way, a homomorphism M-->AxB?

conversely, given a homomorphism M-->AxB, how would you construct homomorphisms M-->A and M-->B?
 


a) To prove that HomR(A x B, M) is isomorphic to HomR(A, M) x HomR(B, M), we need to show that there exists a bijective homomorphism between the two sets. Let f: HomR(A x B, M) -> HomR(A, M) x HomR(B, M) be defined as f(phi) = (phi1, phi2) where phi1(a) = phi(a, 0) and phi2(b) = phi(0, b) for all a in A and b in B. It is clear that f is a homomorphism since for any (a,b) in A x B, we have f(phi)(a,b) = (phi1(a), phi2(b)) = (phi(a,0), phi(0,b)) = phi(a,b). Thus, f is a homomorphism.

To show that f is bijective, we will show that f is injective and surjective. To prove injectivity, let phi1, phi2 be two elements in HomR(A, M) and HomR(B, M) respectively such that f(phi1) = f(phi2). This means that phi1(a) = phi2(a) and phi1(b) = phi2(b) for all a in A and b in B. Then, for any (a,b) in A x B, we have f(phi1)(a,b) = (phi1(a), phi1(b)) = (phi2(a), phi2(b)) = f(phi2)(a,b). Thus, phi1 = phi2 and f is injective.

To prove surjectivity, let (phi1, phi2) be an element in HomR(A, M) x HomR(B, M). Then, for any (a,b) in A x B, we have f(phi1, phi2)(a,b) = (phi1(a), phi2(b)) = (phi(a,0), phi(0,b)) = phi(a,b). Thus, f is surjective and hence bijective.

Therefore, HomR(A x B, M) is isomorphic to HomR(A, M) x HomR(B, M).

b) To prove that HomR(M, A x B) is isomorphic to HomR(M, A) x HomR(M, B), we will use a similar
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top