Proving Q & I: Euler's Formula Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoulofLoneWlf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
Resources for proofs in electricity and magnetism, particularly involving phasors and Euler's formula, are sought after. The discussion highlights the need for mathematical expressions such as Q = Re(Ae^(i[Phi])e^(i[omega]t)) and I = Re(i[omega]Ae^i[phi] e^{i[omega]t}). Participants suggest searching online for phasor-related materials to aid understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping Euler's formula in these contexts. Overall, the thread serves as a guide for finding relevant proofs and resources.
SoulofLoneWlf
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Well just wondering if anyone knew of a place where i could find a proof for electricity and magnetism since it seems i will be needing a lot of these for example

prove
Q = Re(Ae^(i[Phi])e^(i[omega]t))

or show that I moving through a capacitor
I = Re(i[omega]Ae^i[phi] e^{i[omega]t

i mean looking at it, it will need eulers formula but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
google "phasors"
 
Awesome thanks should get me started :D
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top