Proving Rational Solutions of ax^n + a0 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter cooljosh2k2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
cooljosh2k2
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that r is a solution of the equation:

anxn + a(n−1)x(n−1) + . . . + a1x + a0 = 0

where the coefficients ak belongs to Z for k = 0, 1, . . . n, and n is greater or equal to 1. If r is a rational solution r = p/q, where p, q belong to Z and p and q are
coprime, show that q|an and p|a0.


The Attempt at a Solution



Im not even sure where to begin, I am so confused, what am i trying to prove? and how do i prove it, i feel like there is something missing in the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


cooljosh2k2 said:

Homework Statement



Suppose that r is a solution of the equation:

anxn + a(n−1)x(n−1) + . . . + a1x + a0 = 0

where the coefficients ak belongs to Z for k = 0, 1, . . . n, and n is greater or equal to 1. If r is a rational solution r = p/q, where p, q belong to Z and p and q are
coprime, show that q|an and p|a0.


The Attempt at a Solution



Im not even sure where to begin, I am so confused, what am i trying to prove? and how do i prove it, i feel like there is something missing in the question.

Here's an example to help show you how this works. Here's an equation: x2 - 4x + 4 = 0.

In this equation a2, the coefficient of x2, is 1. a0 is the constant term, and is 4.

If there is a rational number r = p/q that is a solution to this equation, this theorem says that p has to divide a0, and q has to divide a2.

As it turns out, 2 is a solution, and is a rational number - i.e., 2 = 2/1. Clearly 2 divides 4, and 1 divides 1.
 


Thanks i got it now, just got confused with the wording.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top