Proving Recurrence Relation by Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter dragonkiller1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recurrence Relation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a recurrence relation using mathematical induction. The original poster presents a recurrence relation defined for n≥2 and provides initial conditions, along with a matrix representation of the terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the base case and inductive step of the proof. The original poster expresses difficulty in progressing through the inductive step, while others suggest focusing on proving a specific matrix equation related to the recurrence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the inductive step. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's struggle, and suggestions are made to clarify the proof structure without reaching a consensus on the final proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the level of assistance provided. The original poster has shown some progress but is seeking further clarification on the inductive step.

dragonkiller1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
x_{xn-1}= 5_{xn-1} - 6_{xn-2};for \ n≥2 \\ x_{1}=1 \\ x_{0}=0

prove by induction that:
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{n}\\ x_{n-1} <br /> \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 5 &amp;-6 \\ <br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}^{n-1}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\0 <br /> \end{bmatrix}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi dragonkiller1! welcome to pf! :wink:

show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I've showed the base step for n=1
For the inductive step:
Suppose P(k) is true for some k
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{k}\\ x_{k-1} <br /> \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 5 &amp;-6 \\ <br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}^{k-1}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\0 <br /> \end{bmatrix}
Then for n=k+1
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{k+1}\\ x_{k} <br /> \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 5 &amp;-6 \\ <br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}^{k}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\0 <br /> \end{bmatrix}
?
I'm stuck on the inductive step. >.<
 
hi dragonkiller1! :smile:

you obviously need to prove

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{n+1}\\ x_{n} <br /> \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 5 &amp;-6 \\ <br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}<br /> x_{n}\\ x_{n-1} <br /> \end{bmatrix}

which is easier …

the top line or the bottom line? :wink:
 
pre multiply 5,-6,1,0 matrix on both the sides(to the k equation) and you will have your proof
 
Oh got it. Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K