Proving Simplicity of Lie Algebra L: Basis Elements and Ideal Structure

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElDavidas
  • Start date Start date
ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Take L to be a subspace of sl (2,R). (R is the real numbers)

<br /> L = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; -c &amp; b\\<br /> c &amp; 0 &amp; -a\\<br /> -b &amp; a &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

The basis elements of L are

<br /> e_1 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -1\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

<br /> e_2 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

<br /> e_3 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

What is the best way to show that this Lie Algebra is simple (i.e. the only ideals are {0} and L? I know it's non-abelian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By working out the [ ] of e_i and e_j, you should see how to show that the commutator spans the whole of the L again. That should do it.

Or you can just write down an isomorphism to sl_2(R). (Surely you meant to say L is a subspace of sl_3).
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
987
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top