Proving Subgroup Criteria for Matrix Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firepanda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Matrix
Click For Summary
To prove that H is a subgroup of GL2R, three criteria must be satisfied. First, H is non-empty as it contains the matrix [[2, 1], [5, 3]]. Second, closure under the group operation requires showing that the product of any two matrices in H remains in H, which can be demonstrated by verifying that the lower left entry remains divisible by 5 and that all entries are integers. Finally, to confirm that the inverse of each element in H is also in H, one can compute the inverse and check it retains the same properties. Utilizing the theorem that states if a subset has the property that a, b in H implies ab^(-1) in H can simplify the proof process.
Firepanda
Messages
425
Reaction score
0
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/9528/matrixex6.jpg

I have 3 subgroup criterion.

For the first i have to show H is non empty, well here the matrix

2 1
5 3

is an element of H, so it is none empty.

The second I have to show that H is closed under the binary operation of GL2R. How do I do this? By definition ig g, h are elements of H, then gh is an element of H. I have no idea how to show this is true for it?

I can find another matrix that would be in the group of H, and I can show the product of the matrices is 1, but do I have to prove it? And how?

Thirdly I have to show the inverse of each element of H belongs to H, which is easy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your set of matrices are all integer matrices with the lower left entry divisible by 5 and determinant 1. Dealing with the determinant 1 condition is pretty easy if you remember det(gh)=det(g)*det(h). Let g1=[[a1,b1],[5c1,d1]] and g2=[[a2,b2],[5c2,d2]]. To show closure multiply g1*g2 and show the lower left corner is still divisible by 5 and all the entries are integers. For inverses compute (g1)^(-1) and show it has the same properties.
 
I think the fastest way might be to exploit that theorem that says that if it's a subset (which it is) that has the property that a,b \in H \Rightarrow ab^{-1} \in H then H is a subgroup. I say that because just exploiting the fact that the determinant is a homomorphism, it's not hard to show that ab^{-1} is in H without doing a lot of math.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K