Proving Summation with Kronecker Delta and Levi-Civita

  • Thread starter Thread starter newton1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equation SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)] = d(il)d(jm) - d(im)d(jl) using the properties of the Kronecker delta and the Levi-Civita permutation symbol. The Kronecker delta, d(ij), equals 1 when i equals j and 0 otherwise, while the Levi-Civita symbol, E(ijk), indicates the parity of permutations of the indices. The proof involves expanding the summation using the definitions of E(ijk) and E(lmk), leading to a series of terms that can be simplified by treating certain components as constants during summation. Ultimately, the process demonstrates how these mathematical constructs interact to yield the desired result. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of the symbols involved in the proof.
newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
i need help...:frown:
prove SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]= d(il)d(jm) - d(im)d(jl)
where "d" is Kronecker delta symbol and "E" is permutation symbol or
Levi-Civita density
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A clarification: the Kronecker delta, d(ij), is 1 if i= j, 0 otherwise.

The Levi-Civita permutation symbol, E(ijk) {real notation is "epsilon"), is 1 if ijk is an even permutation of 123, -1 if ijk is an odd permutation of 123, and 0 otherwise. While d(ij) is defined for all dimensions, E(ijk) implies that i, j, and k can only be 1, 2 ,3. For higher "dimensions" we would need more indices.

SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]= E(ij1)E(lm1)+ E(ij2)E(lm2)+E(ij3)E(lm3)
 


To prove this summation using Kronecker delta and Levi-Civita, we can start by writing out the sum as:

SUM(k) [E(ijk)E(lmk)]

We can then expand the first permutation symbol using its definition:

E(ijk) = d(ij)k - d(ik)j

Substituting this into the original sum, we get:

SUM(k) [d(ij)k - d(ik)j]E(lmk)

Next, we can expand the second permutation symbol in a similar way:

E(lmk) = d(lm)k - d(lk)m

Substituting this into the sum, we get:

SUM(k) [d(ij)k - d(ik)j] [d(lm)k - d(lk)m]

Using the distributive property, we can expand this sum further:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lm)k - SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lk)m - SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lm)k + SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lk)m

Now, let's focus on each term separately. The first term is:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lm)k

Since we are summing over k, we can treat d(ij) and d(lm) as constants. This means we can pull them out of the sum:

d(ij)d(lm) SUM(k) k

The sum of k from 1 to n is simply n(n+1)/2. Therefore, this term simplifies to:

d(ij)d(lm) n(n+1)/2

Similarly, for the second term, we have:

SUM(k) d(ij)kd(lk)m

Again, we can pull out d(ij) and d(lk) as constants, leaving us with:

d(ij)d(lk) SUM(k) km

The sum of km from 1 to n is simply n(n+1)/2. Therefore, this term simplifies to:

d(ij)d(lk) n(n+1)/2

For the third term, we have:

SUM(k) d(ik)jd(lm)k

Following the same steps as before, we can pull out d(ik) and d(lm) as constants, leaving us with:

d(ik)d(lm) SUM(k)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top