Proving that f is bounded on R

  • Thread starter Thread starter vikkisut88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded
vikkisut88
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that f: R -> R is continuous on R and that lim (x -> \infty+)(f(x) = 0) and lim (x -> \infty-)(f(x)=0).
Prove that f is bounded on R


Homework Equations


I have got the proof of when f is continuous on [a,b] then f is bounded on[a,b] but I'm unsure as to whether I can use this proof for this particular question.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is merely the proof I speak of from above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but I can't just assume it is that specific function surely? plus i have to prove it's bounded, not unbounded?!?
 
vikkisut88 said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that f: R -> R is continuous on R and that lim (x -> \infty+)(f(x) = 0) and lim (x -> \infty-)(f(x)=0).
Prove that f is bounded on R

Using the definitions of the above limits you should be able to show that f is bounded on sets of the form [b,+\infty) and (-\infty,a] for some a, b.

vikkisut88 said:

Homework Equations


I have got the proof of when f is continuous on [a,b] then f is bounded on[a,b] but I'm unsure as to whether I can use this proof for this particular question.

Then use the result for compact intervals [a,b] to complete the proof that f is bounded on all of R.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top