Proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences

gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let V be the vector space consisting of all infinite real sequences. Show that the subset W consisting of all such sequences with only finitely many non-0 entities is a subspace of V

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so i have to show 1.Closure under Addition,2. Closure under Scalar Multiplcation

let x=(x_{n}),y=(y_{n}) \in W
x + y \in W closed under addition and since W is a set of finite sequences \in V as it consists of infinite sequences

\lambda is a scalar and \lambdax \in W closed under scalar multiplication and since W is a set of finite sequences \in V as it consists of infinite sequences

I think this proves it

...But if \lambda is negative this proof doesn't work,is there something i am missing or have i provided the required proof?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You want to check your definitions for V and W.
W is not closed under addition because the sequences in W are finite and those in V are infinite... you actually told us yourself that V consists of finite sequences.
What you need to check is that when you add two sequences with finitely many non-zero entries, you get something with finitely many non-zero entries.

So either look carefully at your proof, or at your definitions, because it looks like the proof doesn't belong to the exercise.
 


whoops really sorry V consists of all infinite real sequences.

if W only consists of finitely many entries and V consists of infinite does it not follow that W has to be a sub space?
 


Yes, it follows, but you still have to show it by checking the properties of a subspace.

For example: is W closed? I.e., if you take two infinite sequences with only finitely many non-zero entries, and you add them, do you get again a sequence with only finitely many non-zero entries?

What else do you have to show?
 


Suppose u has n non-zero entries and v has m non zero entries. What is the maximum possible number of non-zero entries of u+ v?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top