Proving that this equation goes through the points

  • Thread starter Thread starter unknown101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using vector mathematics to prove a scalar equation for a line through two points, P1(x1, y1) and P2(x2, y2). Participants express confusion about the relationship between vectors and the equation, particularly in identifying the normal vector and the slope. They discuss the need to express the relationship between points as separate equations to eliminate the constant k. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in writing equations and understanding vector relationships. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate that the vector from P1 to P2 is parallel to the vector from a point P on the line to P1.
unknown101
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use a vector solution to show that a scalar equation for the line through the points P1(x1,y1) and P2(x2,y2) is y-y1/x-x2=y2-y1/x2-x1

Homework Equations


Find a vector which is normal to the line and then use the dot product of this vector and P1P

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using numbers but I got lost. I don't what exactly this question is asking. Would I have to find the slope and then come up with a solution from that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi unknown101! :smile:
unknown101 said:
Use a vector solution to show that a scalar equation for the line through the points P1(x1,y1) and P2(x2,y2) is y-y1/x-x2=y2-y1/x2-x1

(is that the right answer?)

Hint: call a point on the line P.

What do you know about the vectors PP1 and P1P2 ? :wink:
 
OK so I call a point P. I don't know what you mean about those two vectors. Would I have to find the m which is the slop and then n which is the normal point. Looking at my notes none of this makes sense:confused:
 
vector maths

unknown101 said:
OK so I call a point P. I don't know what you mean about those two vectors. Would I have to find the m which is the slop and then n which is the normal point. Looking at my notes none of this makes sense:confused:

ah … doesn't look as if your teacher has introduced you to the joys of vector maths, as opposed to coordinate maths.

Vector maths tries to avoid using coordinates …

for example, (a + b)2 = a2 + 2a.b + b2 is proved by simple algebra, and is a lot easier than the coordinate proof! :wink:

In vector maths, you can only really use three combinations …

a.b, axb, and ka (where k is a constant) …

which one(s) do you think would help in proving that PP1 is parallel to P1P2 ? :smile:
 
Would I use a.b to prove that is it parallel?
 
It's easier to use a = kb
 
So if I use a=kb will I have to find the constant. Looking at the equation I'm trying to prove, do I have to to find out what y and x( the x and y without the number)?
 
Hint: write a = kb in coordinates, and see if you can eliminate k. :wink:
 
I wrote a=kb in coordinates. I don't if I did it correctly.
x1y1=k(x2y2)
x1k1/x2y2=k

Is that all i need to do?
 
  • #10
unknown101 said:
x1y1=k(x2y2)

you're making it look like one equation …

it's (x1 , y1) = k(x2 , y2), which is two equations …

so write them out and eliminate k :smile:
 
  • #11
So I did that I got (x1, y1)/x2, y2)=k
 
  • #12
unknown101 said:
So I did that I got (x1, y1)/x2, y2)=k

So this is the final answer?
 
  • #13
unknown101 said:
So I did that I got (x1, y1)/x2, y2)=k

uhhh?

that doesn't even make sense …

you can't divide a vector by another vector

write two equations
 
  • #14
You said I should write out 2 equations:
(x1,y1)=k(x2,y2)
x1,y1=kx2,ky2
Is that right?
 
  • #15
unknown101 said:
x1,y1=kx2,ky2
Is that right?

Yes … but it would be clearer if you wrote it explicitly as two equations …

anyway, now eliminate k :smile:
 
  • #16
tiny-tim said:
Yes … but it would be clearer if you wrote it explicitly as two equations …

anyway, now eliminate k :smile:

By writing as two equations do you mean as in...
1.(x1,y1)
2.(kx2,ky2)

Eliminate k. The only way I can think for eliminating k is
kx2,ky2=0
kx2,ky2/k=o/k
x2,y2=0

I don't know if I'm doing this right.
 
  • #17
unknown101 said:
By writing as two equations do you mean as in...
1.(x1,y1)
2.(kx2,ky2)

They aren't equations …

an equation is something with an = sign in the middle
kx2,ky2=0
kx2,ky2/k=o/k
x2,y2=0

?? this doesn't make any sense at all

write (x1 , y1) = k(x2 , y2) as two equations …

that's two completely separate sentences, each with an = in the middle
 
  • #18
Ok I kind of understand it now.
This is what I have so far
x1,y1=kx2,ky2
(x1,y1)/(k,k)=(kx2,ky2)/(k,k)
(x1,y1)/(k,k)=(x2,y2)
 
  • #19
unknown101 said:
Ok I kind of understand it now.
This is what I have so far
x1,y1=kx2,ky2
(x1,y1)/(k,k)=(kx2,ky2)/(k,k)
(x1,y1)/(k,k)=(x2,y2)

Is that right?
 
Back
Top