Proving the Continuity of Projections in Vector Spaces

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Are projections always continuous? If they are, is there simple way to prove it?

If P:V->V is a projection, I can see that P(V) is a subspace, and restriction of P to this subspace is the identity, and it seems intuitively clear that vectors outside this subspace are always mapped to shorter ones, but I don't know how to prove it.

If V was a Hilbert space, and we knew P(V) is closed, then I could prove this using the projection theorem. However only way to prove that P(V) is closed, that I know, is to use continuity of P.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a counter example?

P:l^1\to l^1

(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,2,0,0,0,0,0,\ldots)
(0,1,0,0,0,0,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,1,0,0,0,0,0,\ldots)
(0,0,1,0,0,0,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,0,0,3,0,0,0,\ldots)
(0,0,0,1,0,0,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,0,0,1,0,0,0,\ldots)
(0,0,0,0,1,0,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,0,0,0,0,4,0,\ldots)
(0,0,0,0,0,1,0,\ldots)\mapsto (0,0,0,0,0,1,0,\ldots)
\cdots

hmh.. no it is not, because the mapping is not well defined, since (1,1,1,...) would be mapped to have infinite norm. But if we choose such vector spaces, where only finite amount of components can have non-zero values, then that could be it.

(It seems I mixed l^1 and l^{\infty}.)
 
Last edited:
just take a non closed subspace and a complement and project on the complement.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top