Proving the Equality of Topologies for the Usual and Taxicab Metrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter LMKIYHAQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the topologies induced by the usual metric and the taxicab metric on R² are equivalent. Participants explore how to demonstrate that open balls in one metric contain open balls in the other, using geometric interpretations and algebraic inequalities. Visualizing the shapes of the open balls—a circle for the usual metric and a diamond for the taxicab metric—helps clarify their relationship. The conversation emphasizes the importance of establishing bounds between the two metrics to show their equivalence. Ultimately, the goal is to confirm that both metrics induce the same topology on R².
LMKIYHAQ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let d be the usual metric on RxR and let p be the taxicab metric on RxR. Prove that the topology of d = the topology of p.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am trying to show that the open ball around point (x,y) with E/2 as the radius (in topology d) is a subset of the open ball around point (x,y) with E as the radius (in topology p), which is a subset of the open ball around point(x,y) with E as the radius (in topology d).

I have chosen point (a,b) and assumed it is in the usual metric. I have tried to show then that the point in the taxi-cab metric is less than E, using the usual metric's distance formula less than E/2. I have done some algebra to see that l x-a l + l y-b l < E^{2}. I am not sure how to go from here since I need to show l x-a l + l y-b l < E? Once I get the inequality less than E, then do I show\sqrt{(x-a)^{2} +(y-b)^{2}} < E?


Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does an open ball of radius r look like in the taxicab metric? Can you picture it? Describe it.
 
I have already pictured it. I thought the "proof by picture" would be a circle (usual top) inside of a rotated square (diamond shape) for taxi-cab top, and that all inside another larger circle. Is this correct? I am still having trouble with the proof even though I have visualized it.
 
LMKIYHAQ said:
I have already pictured it. I thought the "proof by picture" would be a circle (usual top) inside of a rotated square (diamond shape) for taxi-cab top, and that all inside another larger circle. Is this correct? I am still having trouble with the proof even though I have visualized it.

Sure. It's a diamond. It's not that hard to prove. You just figure out that the graph of the boundary |x|-|y|=r consists of four intersecting lines. The 'radius' of the diamond is 1/2 the diagonal. So a diamond of radius r is contained in a circle of radius r. What's the radius of a circle contained in a diamond of radius r?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the response. I can see how what you have said works pictorially but I still can't see how I can use the formula for the usual topoloy < E/2 to get it to say that the taxicab top formula< E. I know once I do this, I will be able to assume the point (a,b) is in the the taxicab metric and then I will have the taxicab metric formula< E and will have to show somehow that the usual top formula < E? Where should I start?
 
All you have to show is that every ball in the ordinary metric contains a ball in the taxicab metric and vice versa. Isn't that enough to show they induce the same topology? I you know what they look like then just use geometry.
 
Last edited:
What algebra should I use?
 
LMKIYHAQ said:
What algebra should I use?

As I appended to the last message just use the geometry, if you know what the shapes look like. E.g. I have a taxicab ball around x of radius R. If I have an ordinary ball around x of radius r, how small does r have to be relative to R to make sure the circle is contained in the diamond?
 
I guess I am having trouble bc my professor wants me to show in terms of E and E/2 the containment. I know that \sqrt{(x-a)^{2}+(y-b)^{2}}=E for an open ball in the usual and l x-a l +l y-b l=E for the taxicab. I do not know how to show the taxicab is contatined on the usual here.
 
  • #10
Ok, so you want to do inequalities instead of geometry. Then you want to find constants K and L such that K*(|x-a|+|y-b|)<=sqrt((x-a)^2+(y-b)^2)<=L*(|x-a|+|y-b|). For L just think about the triangle inequality. For K, suppose sqrt((x-a)^2+(y-b)^2)=r. Then |x-a|<=r and |y-b|<=r, right? So |x-a|+|y-b|<=?
 
Back
Top