Proving the Existence of Infinite Functions from One Domain to Another

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of infinite functions from one set to another, particularly from set A to set B, using the example of real numbers. It clarifies that while many functions can be defined, not every subset of the Cartesian product AxB represents a valid function. A valid function must map each element in the domain to exactly one element in the codomain, leading to infinite possibilities when considering subsets of real intervals. The conversation emphasizes that even a trivial domain can yield an unbounded number of functions due to the infinite nature of real intervals. Thus, the existence of infinite functions can be established through the properties of subsets in the Cartesian product.
C0nfused
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I guess most of you know how a function is defined from a set A to a set B. How do we prove that many different functions exist (usually, if sets A and B are for example R) from A to B? Of course we can come up with many different functions, real ones for example, but is there any other way of proving that the set of real functions for example has infinite elements?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If A and B are sets, then by the definition of "function", a function from A into B can be represented as a set of ordered pairs (elements of the Cartesian product AxB), and thus as a subset of AxB. I'm sure you can see where to go from there. :)
 
hypermorphism said:
If A and B are sets, then by the definition of "function", a function from A into B can be represented as a set of ordered pairs (elements of the Cartesian product AxB), and thus as a subset of AxB. I'm sure you can see where to go from there. :)
So for each subset one function exists? For example RxR has infinite subsets so infinite different real functions can be defined?
 
C0nfused said:
So for each subset one function exists?
Not necessarily. The set {(a,b), (a,c)} is not a representation of any function, for example. Rather, you're looking for subsets of the form {a}xB for all a in the domain of f, where the image of f is the set consisting of exactly one element from each such set. Since each of those sets is infinite for your nontrivial real intervals, the amount of such functions is unbounded for even the trivial domain of one real number.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top