Proving the Harmonic Property of Analytic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) are the real and imaginary parts, respectively, of an analytic function w(z).
Assuming that the required derivatives exist, show that

\bigtriangledown^2 u=\bigtriangledown^2 v=0

Solutions of Laplace's equation such as u(x,y) and v(x,y) are called harmonic functions.


Homework Equations


Cauchy-Riemann conditions:

\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}
\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}


The Attempt at a Solution


I expanded \bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta u}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} + \frac{\delta u}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} and using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions I found

\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}\frac{\delta v}{\delta y} + \frac{\delta v}{\delta x}\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}=\bigtriangledown^2 v

What I can't figure out how to do is prove that this is equal to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your eqs. for del^2 are wrong.
\nabla^2 u=\partial_x\partial_x u+\partial_y\partial_y u.
 
Dang, you're right. Can I dot it into an element of length like this?

\bigtriangledown^2 u \bullet d\vec{r}^2 = \frac{\delta}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} dx^2 + \frac{\delta}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} dy^2
 
There is a hint in the problem that says I need to construct vectors normal to the curves u(x,y)=c_i and v(x,y)=c_j. Wow, I'm pretty lost.
 
The Cauchy-Riemann equations are
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}
\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
which is what you have, allowing for your peculiar use of \delta rather than \partial!

Now just do the obvious: differentiate both sides of the first equation with respect to x and differentiate both sides of the second equation with respect to y and compare them.

Are you sure that the hint is for this particular problem? A normal vector to u(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}
and a normal vector to v(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\vec{j}.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, that second equation is
-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{j}
which tells us the the two families of curves are orthogonal but that does not directly tell us about \nabla^2 u and \nabla^2 v.
 
Thanks for your reply.

There is a part b) to the problem, and it is this:

b) Show that

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0

I solved it easily using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so I figured that the hint was for the first part.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top