Proving the Irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$. Participants explore various approaches to constructing a proof, referencing traditional methods used for $\sqrt{2}$ and discussing the implications of certain mathematical properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof structure based on the assumption that $\sqrt{3} = \frac{p}{q}$, leading to the conclusion that both $p$ and $q$ must be even, which would imply a common factor, contradicting their initial assumption.
  • Another participant suggests that the proof should focus on multiples of $3$ rather than the concept of evenness, arguing that this clarification could strengthen the argument.
  • A different participant proposes a contrapositive approach to show that if a number is not a multiple of $3$, then its square is also not a multiple of $3$, which could support the proof of irrationality.
  • Another perspective introduces a broader claim that any square-free positive integer must have an irrational square root, hinting at a general principle that could apply to $\sqrt{3}$.
  • A later post revises the initial proof attempt, emphasizing the necessity for both $p$ and $q$ to be multiples of $3$, while still concluding that this leads to a contradiction regarding their common factors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of agreement on the general approach to proving the irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$, but there is no consensus on the best method or the clarity of the arguments presented. Multiple competing views on the proof structure and the role of evenness versus multiples of $3$ remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion surrounding the terminology used in proofs, particularly regarding the use of "even" versus "multiple of $3$." There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the proofs presented, particularly in establishing the relationships between $p$ and $q$.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in number theory, specifically those exploring proofs of irrationality and the properties of square roots in relation to integers.

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
prove that $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

this is what I tried

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ assuming that $3q^2$ is even then $p^2$ is even hence p is also even.

$(3k)^2=3q^2$ where is k is an even integer.

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ q is also even

if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is my proof correct? if it's not, can you show me the correct proof of this.

thanks!(Talking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
prove that $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

this is what I tried

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ assuming that $3q^2$ is even then $p^2$ is even hence p is also even.

$(3k)^2=3q^2$ where is k is an even integer.

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ q is also even

if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is my proof correct? if it's not, can you show me the correct proof of this.

thanks!(Talking)
You have the right idea, but it is buried in a layer of confusion surrounding the word "even". You are obviously trying to model your proof on the standard proof that $\sqrt2$ is irrational. The proof for $\sqrt2$ is based on showing that in that case $p$ and $q$ must both be even. But the reason that even numbers are important in that proof is that an even number is a multiple of $2$. If you go back to that proof and substitute "multiple of $2$" every time you see the word "even", then you will have a better idea of how to do the proof for $\sqrt3$. All you will have to do is to replace "multiple of $2$" by "multiple of $3$". The proof for $\sqrt3$ should not involve the word "even" at all. What really matters (as you have realized towards the end of your argument) is that $p$ and $q$ must both be multiples of $3$. If you focus your argument entirely on that, and leave out all references to numbers being even, then you will have a good proof of this result.
 
It would also be a good idea to prove that the square of number is only a multiple of three if the number was a multiple of three.

This would be easiest to prove using the contrapositive, which is "if the number is not a multiple of three, then the square is not a multiple of three".

So if we have integers p and k such that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} p = 3k + 1 \end{align*}$ then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} p^2 &= \left( 3k + 1 \right) ^2 \\ &= 3k^2 + 6k + 1 \\ &= 3 \left( k^2 + 2k \right) + 1 \end{align*}$

which is not a multiple of three. Also if p and k were integers such that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} p = 3k + 2 \end{align*}$, then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} p^2 &= \left( 3k + 2 \right) ^2 \\ &= 9k^2 + 12k + 4 \\ &= 9k^2 + 12k + 3 + 1 \\ &= 3 \left( 3k^2 + 4k + 1 \right) + 1 \end{align*}$

which is also not a multiple of three.

Therefore if the square of a number was a multiple of three, the original number had to have been a multiple of three. Q.E.D.
 
A lesser known form of proof runs as follows:

If $n$ is a natural number, and $\sqrt{n} \in \Bbb Q$, then $\sqrt{n} \in \Bbb Z$.

You may want to reflect a bit on why this is so, because it is NOT obvious. I suggest approaching this problem like so:

Suppose $n = \dfrac{a^2}{b^2}$, and that $p$ is a prime for which $p^k|b$ but $p^{k+1}\not\mid b$. Show that $p^k|a$, and thus conclude $b|a$.

So in looking for square root(s) of 3, we need only consider $\{-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3\}$, which we can test individually.

In particular, any square-free positive integer must have an irrational square root (this is a powerful result, as it handles MANY cases "all at once").
 
This is my second attemp

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ since $3q^2$ is a multiple of 3 p must also be a multiple of 3.

now I have,

$(3k)^2=3q^2$

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ $q^2$ is also a multiple of 3.

but if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is this now correct?

thanks!(Talking)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K