MHB Proving the Irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$. The initial proof attempt correctly sets up the assumption that $\sqrt{3} = \frac{p}{q}$, leading to the conclusion that both integers p and q must be multiples of 3. This results in a contradiction, as it implies a common factor of 3, violating the assumption that p and q have no common factors other than ±1. Subsequent clarifications emphasize the importance of focusing on multiples of 3 rather than the concept of evenness in the proof. The final proof attempt aligns with these corrections, affirming that $\sqrt{3}$ is indeed irrational.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
prove that $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

this is what I tried

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ assuming that $3q^2$ is even then $p^2$ is even hence p is also even.

$(3k)^2=3q^2$ where is k is an even integer.

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ q is also even

if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is my proof correct? if it's not, can you show me the correct proof of this.

thanks!(Talking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
prove that $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

this is what I tried

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ assuming that $3q^2$ is even then $p^2$ is even hence p is also even.

$(3k)^2=3q^2$ where is k is an even integer.

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ q is also even

if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is my proof correct? if it's not, can you show me the correct proof of this.

thanks!(Talking)
You have the right idea, but it is buried in a layer of confusion surrounding the word "even". You are obviously trying to model your proof on the standard proof that $\sqrt2$ is irrational. The proof for $\sqrt2$ is based on showing that in that case $p$ and $q$ must both be even. But the reason that even numbers are important in that proof is that an even number is a multiple of $2$. If you go back to that proof and substitute "multiple of $2$" every time you see the word "even", then you will have a better idea of how to do the proof for $\sqrt3$. All you will have to do is to replace "multiple of $2$" by "multiple of $3$". The proof for $\sqrt3$ should not involve the word "even" at all. What really matters (as you have realized towards the end of your argument) is that $p$ and $q$ must both be multiples of $3$. If you focus your argument entirely on that, and leave out all references to numbers being even, then you will have a good proof of this result.
 
It would also be a good idea to prove that the square of number is only a multiple of three if the number was a multiple of three.

This would be easiest to prove using the contrapositive, which is "if the number is not a multiple of three, then the square is not a multiple of three".

So if we have integers p and k such that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} p = 3k + 1 \end{align*}$ then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} p^2 &= \left( 3k + 1 \right) ^2 \\ &= 3k^2 + 6k + 1 \\ &= 3 \left( k^2 + 2k \right) + 1 \end{align*}$

which is not a multiple of three. Also if p and k were integers such that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} p = 3k + 2 \end{align*}$, then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} p^2 &= \left( 3k + 2 \right) ^2 \\ &= 9k^2 + 12k + 4 \\ &= 9k^2 + 12k + 3 + 1 \\ &= 3 \left( 3k^2 + 4k + 1 \right) + 1 \end{align*}$

which is also not a multiple of three.

Therefore if the square of a number was a multiple of three, the original number had to have been a multiple of three. Q.E.D.
 
A lesser known form of proof runs as follows:

If $n$ is a natural number, and $\sqrt{n} \in \Bbb Q$, then $\sqrt{n} \in \Bbb Z$.

You may want to reflect a bit on why this is so, because it is NOT obvious. I suggest approaching this problem like so:

Suppose $n = \dfrac{a^2}{b^2}$, and that $p$ is a prime for which $p^k|b$ but $p^{k+1}\not\mid b$. Show that $p^k|a$, and thus conclude $b|a$.

So in looking for square root(s) of 3, we need only consider $\{-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3\}$, which we can test individually.

In particular, any square-free positive integer must have an irrational square root (this is a powerful result, as it handles MANY cases "all at once").
 
This is my second attemp

$\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}$ whee p and q are integers in lowest terms. common factor of +\-1 only.

squaring both sides

$\frac{p^2}{q^2}=3$

$p^2=3q^2$ since $3q^2$ is a multiple of 3 p must also be a multiple of 3.

now I have,

$(3k)^2=3q^2$

then,

$q^2=3k^2$ $q^2$ is also a multiple of 3.

but if p and q is even they have common factor of 3, thus contradicting the assumption that they have no common factor except +\-1. hence $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

is this now correct?

thanks!(Talking)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top