Proving the Non-negativity Property of a Diffusion Equation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter modeiry88
  • Start date Start date
modeiry88
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let u(x,t) satisfy


Homework Equations




(\partialu/\partialt) = (\partial^{2}u/\partialx^{2})...(0<x<1,t>0)

u(0,t)=u(1,t)=0...(t\geq0)

u(x,0)=f(x)...(o\leqx\leq1),

where f\inC[0.1] show that for any T\geq0

\int from 0..1 (u(x,T))^{2}dx \leq \int from 0..1 (f(x))^{2}dx


The Attempt at a Solution



not sure
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's 3 posts and no work shown on anyone of them. You *must* show an attempt at a solution, or we cannot be of help to you. Please click on the "Rules" link at the top of the page.
 
im sorry, I am obviously knew to this forum...

For this problem, I am trying to use the identity as follows

2u((\partialu/\partialt)-(\partial^{2}u/\partialx^{2})) = (\partialu^{2}/\partialt)-(\partial/\partialx)*(u*(\partialu/\partialx))+2*(\partialu/\partialx)^{2}
 
It's a diffusion equation, so you might expect this sort of behavior. Your 'identity' is a little messed up. Can you fix it? Once you've done that substitute the PDE in. You should be able to show that ((u^2),t)/2-(u*(u,x)),x=(-(u,x)^2)<=0. I'm using commas for partial derivatives, forgive my laziness. Now integrate dx between 0 and 1. Can you show the (u*(u,x)),x term vanishes? Once you have integal (u^2),t<=0 you are home free.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top