Proving the Renormalization of Phi^4 Theory: A Challenge for Mr. Fogg

Phileas.Fogg
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
to understand the renormalization of phi^4 theory, I read Peskin Schröder and Ryder. In both books important steps are left out. I found the following identity in Peskin Schöder "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" on page page 808, equation A.52 (Appendix)

\frac{\Gamma(2 - \frac{d}{2})}{(4\pi)^{\frac{d}{2}}} \left( \frac{1}{\Delta} \right)^{2-\frac{d}{2}} = \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon} - log(\Delta) - \gamma + log(4\pi) + O(\epsilon)\right)

Now I want to prove that explicitly, but I don't know how to start and how the logarithm on the right hand side appears.

Could anyone help me?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Phileas.Fogg said:
to understand the renormalization of phi^4 theory, I read Peskin Schröder and Ryder. In both books important steps are left out.

That's why you should read a book like Srednicki that doesn't leave steps out.

For any nonzero A and small x,

A^x=\exp(x\ln A)=1+x\ln A + O(x^2)

\Gamma(x) = {1\over x}-\gamma+O(x)

These are equations 14.33 and 14.26 in Srednicki.
 
Last edited:


Thank You,

so I get this expression:

\frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon} - \gamma \right) \left(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} ln(\frac{4 \pi}{\Delta})\right)

But that's not the equation from Peskin & Schröder, isn't it?

How do I go on to get it finally?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 


It's the same. Just multiply it out, and use ln(a/b)=ln(a)-ln(b).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top