- 3,372
- 465
THREAD CHANGE *SPINOR IDENTITY*...although it's connected with SuSy in general, it's more basic...
I am trying to prove for two spinors the identity:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{1}{2}ε^{αβ}(θθ)
I thought that a nice way would be to use the antisymmetry in the exchange of α and β, and propose that:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε^{αβ}
where A is to be determined... To do so I contracted with another metric ε so that:
ε_{γα}θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε_{γα}ε^{αβ} = Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So I got that:
θ_{γ}θ^{β}= Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So for β≠γ I'll have that
θ_{γ}θ^{β}=0
And for β=γ I'll have that
θ_{β}θ^{β}=-A=-θ^{β}θ_{β}
or A=(θθ)
And end up:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= ε^{αβ} (θθ)
Another way I could determine A, would be by dimensionaly asking for [spinor]^2 term, without indices which would lead me again in A=(θθ)...but the same problem remains
Unfortunately I cannot understand how the 1/2 factor disappears...Meaning I counted something twice (I don't know what that something is)..
Could it be that I had to write first:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{(θ^{α}θ^{β}-θ^{β}θ^{α})}{2}
and then say that the difference on the numerator is proportional to the spinor metric ε? If so, why?
I am trying to prove for two spinors the identity:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{1}{2}ε^{αβ}(θθ)
I thought that a nice way would be to use the antisymmetry in the exchange of α and β, and propose that:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε^{αβ}
where A is to be determined... To do so I contracted with another metric ε so that:
ε_{γα}θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε_{γα}ε^{αβ} = Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So I got that:
θ_{γ}θ^{β}= Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So for β≠γ I'll have that
θ_{γ}θ^{β}=0
And for β=γ I'll have that
θ_{β}θ^{β}=-A=-θ^{β}θ_{β}
or A=(θθ)
And end up:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= ε^{αβ} (θθ)
Another way I could determine A, would be by dimensionaly asking for [spinor]^2 term, without indices which would lead me again in A=(θθ)...but the same problem remains
Unfortunately I cannot understand how the 1/2 factor disappears...Meaning I counted something twice (I don't know what that something is)..
Could it be that I had to write first:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{(θ^{α}θ^{β}-θ^{β}θ^{α})}{2}
and then say that the difference on the numerator is proportional to the spinor metric ε? If so, why?
Last edited: