Proving the "Thread Change: Spinor Identity

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
THREAD CHANGE *SPINOR IDENTITY*...although it's connected with SuSy in general, it's more basic...

I am trying to prove for two spinors the identity:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{1}{2}ε^{αβ}(θθ)

I thought that a nice way would be to use the antisymmetry in the exchange of α and β, and propose that:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε^{αβ}
where A is to be determined... To do so I contracted with another metric ε so that:

ε_{γα}θ^{α}θ^{β}= A ε_{γα}ε^{αβ} = Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So I got that:

θ_{γ}θ^{β}= Α (-δ^{β}_{γ})
So for β≠γ I'll have that
θ_{γ}θ^{β}=0
And for β=γ I'll have that
θ_{β}θ^{β}=-A=-θ^{β}θ_{β}
or A=(θθ)

And end up:
θ^{α}θ^{β}= ε^{αβ} (θθ)

Another way I could determine A, would be by dimensionaly asking for [spinor]^2 term, without indices which would lead me again in A=(θθ)...but the same problem remains
Unfortunately I cannot understand how the 1/2 factor disappears...Meaning I counted something twice (I don't know what that something is)..

Could it be that I had to write first:
θ^{α}θ^{β}=\frac{(θ^{α}θ^{β}-θ^{β}θ^{α})}{2}
and then say that the difference on the numerator is proportional to the spinor metric ε? If so, why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is a minus sign on right hand side.Anyway ,you should use the identity ##ε_{AB}ε^{CD}=δ^{D}_{A}δ^{C}_{B}-δ^{C}_{A}δ^{D}_{B}##.
So,
##-\frac{1}{2}ε^{AB}(θθ)=-\frac{1}{2}ε^{AB}ε_{CD}θ^Cθ^D=-\frac{1}{2}[δ^{B}_{C}δ^{A}_{D}-δ^{A}_{C}δ^{B}_{D}]θ^Cθ^D=-\frac{1}{2}[θ^Bθ^A-θ^Aθ^B]=θ^Aθ^B##
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks... although I'm also trying to understand how/where I did the "mistake" in my approach :)
The minus, at least for the notations I'm following, is for when you have the conjugate spinors ...
 
ChrisVer said:
And for β=γ I'll have that
θ_{β}θ^{β}=-A=-θ^{β}θ_{β}
or A=(θθ)
don't you think you have missed a factor of 2 here.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top