Proving the Triangle Inequality Theorem using Coordinates

siliang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the Triangle Inequality Theorum using the coordinate system.


Homework Equations


The corners of the triangles will be at (x1,y1), (x2, y2), (x3,y3)


The Attempt at a Solution



The proof that I know is proving that |x+y|<=|x|+|y|:

-|x|<x<|x|, and -|y|<y<|y|
then -|x|-|y|<x+y<|x|+|y|
absolute value proterty yields |x+y|<=|x|+|y|

I have absolutely no idea how to incorporate the coordinate system into my proof. I would assume the distance formula has something to do with it. Can someone please help? > . <
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, take the distance along the longest side. (I'm going to assume that x1 to x3 is the side that is longest) So, you know the formula for distance between those two points. Then prove that this distance is less than the sum of the lengths of the x1-x2 line and the x2-x3 line.
 
How does the distance from (x1, y1) to (x2, y2)

PLUS

the distance from (x2, y2) to (x3, y3)

compare to

the distance from (x1, y1) to (x3, y3)

?
 
the triangle inequality states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle is larger than the third. Thanks for the help. But what if I wanted to prove is that for ANY given triangle or for any given 3 sides of a triangle, the triangle inequality applies?
 
siliang said:
the triangle inequality states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle is larger than the third. Thanks for the help. But what if I wanted to prove is that for ANY given triangle or for any given 3 sides of a triangle, the triangle inequality applies?

Just do the same process for all three cases. Prove for each side that the length of that side is less than the length of the other two.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top