Proving two events are independent given that one has a probability of 1

LCBlazer07
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Show that an event A is independent of every event B if P(A)=0 or P(A)=1.


**I was able to prove the first part of this problem that is that the events are independent when P(A)=0. However I am stuck on the part where P(A)=1.


I have this so far:

P(A n B) = P(A)P(B/A)
= (1)P(B/A)
= P(B/A)

If the events are independent then P(A n B) = P(A)P(B) = (PB)

So basically i have to show P(B/A) = P(B)...but I do cannot find a way to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try it the other way:
P(A n B) = P(B)P(A/B)
 
Ok, so i started using that suggestion and got the following...

P( A n B) = P(B)P(A/B)
then I was going to say that P(A n B) = P(B), but I how can I prove that P(A/B)=1 without assuming that A and B are independent.
 
thanks for the suggestion, but I was able to solve this problem by using the complement.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top