MHB Proving Vector Equality Using Cross Products

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBigBadBen
  • Start date Start date
TheBigBadBen
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
This is a question from Yahoo! answers.

The Question:
Suppose that we know vectors v ×u= w×u for every three-dimensional vector w . Prove that v = w.
Hint: Choose a few simple vectors
for u and compute the cross products. What does this say about the coordinates of v and
w?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My Answer:

So, we have two vectors $\vec v=(v_1,v_2,v_3)$ and $\vec w=(w_1,w_2,w_3)$ such that
$$\vec v\times \vec u=\vec w \times \vec u$$
for every choice of vector $\vec u$. We can say that the two vectors are the same if $v_1=w_1$, $v_2=w_2$, and $v_3=w_3$. As the hint suggests, I will choose the following vectors to put in the place of $\vec u$: $\vec u_1 = (1,0,0)$ and $\vec u_2 = (0,1,0)$. We know that
$$\vec v\times \vec u_1=\vec w \times \vec u_1 \\
\vec v\times \vec u_2=\vec w \times \vec u_2$$
Finding these products gives us the following set of equations:
$$
(0,v_3,-v_2)=(0,w_3,-w_2) \\
(-v_3,0,v_1)=(-w_3,0,w_1)
$$
Setting each of the coordinates equal, the first equation tells us that $v_3=w_3$ and $-v_2=-w_2$. The second equation tells us that, because the third entries are equal, $v_1=w_1$. With these three pieces of information, we can now say that $\vec v = \vec w$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top