Proving Vector Space of 3-Tuples Fulfilling 3x1 - x2 + 5x3 = 0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the set of ordered 3-tuples (x1, x2, x3) satisfying the equation 3x1 - x2 + 5x3 = 0 forms a vector space within R^3. Participants emphasize the importance of demonstrating closure under addition and scalar multiplication to establish the vector space properties. It is noted that while all ten axioms of vector spaces are typically required, proving closure can simplify the process, as other properties follow from it. The conversation highlights that the subset's vector space characteristics can inherit properties from the larger space. Ultimately, closure under both operations is essential for the proof.
alexngo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that the collection of all ordered 3-tupples (x1,x2,x3) whose components satisfy 3x1 - x2 + 5x3 = 0 forms a vector space with the respect the usual operation of R3.


Homework Equations


3x1 - x2 + 5x3


The Attempt at a Solution


we tried it by addition and multipication..solutions would be appreciated asap
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi alexngo! Welcome to PF! :wink:
alexngo said:
we tried it by addition and multipication..

ok! … show us what you get! :smile:
 
by showing that it respects both addition and multiplication does this proves it to be a vector space or we need to show taht it satisfies all 10 axioms
 
Technically you need to show all 10 of them. But note that, if your set is a vector space, then it is a subspace of R^3. In simpler terms: the "vectors" from your vector space are just vectors as you know them. So the axioms about distributivity and associativity carry over to the subspace (for example: if the addition of three arbitrary 3-d vectors is associative, then the addition of three special ones of the form (x, y, (y-3x)/5) is definitely associative as well). In fact there is a reduced set of axioms which you can use to show that a subset of a vector space is a vector space.
 
alexngo said:
by showing that it respects both addition and multiplication does this proves it to be a vector space or we need to show taht it satisfies all 10 axioms

You only need the closure axioms …

you don't need to prove eg a + b = b + a because so long as you've proved closure, ie that b + a is in the collection, then a + b = b + a is automatically satisfied.

But of course, you do still need to prove closure under multiplication by a scalar. :wink:

EDIT: oooh, CompuChip :smile: beat me to it! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top