Proving We Are All Goats: A Logical Argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmy p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the provocative idea that increased knowledge may negatively impact earning potential, supported by a mathematical equation suggesting that as knowledge decreases, potential earnings increase. This is derived from the postulates that knowledge equates to power and time equates to money, leading to the conclusion that less knowledge correlates with higher income. Additionally, a logical proof is presented claiming that "Everything is a Goat," using propositional logic to argue that if the statement is false, its opposite must be true, thus affirming the original statement. This claim sparks a brief debate about the validity of the logic used, with participants questioning the reasoning behind the proof.
jimmy p
Gold Member
Messages
399
Reaction score
72
Why Bother?

Throughout the ages many have suspected that there's no point in learning anything. Now, however, we have evidence that this is true! At least it transpires that knowledge acts as a brake on an individual's earning potential. This theorem (the more you know the less you earn) can be supported by a mathematical equation based on the following two postulates:

Postulate 1: Knowledge is power

Postulate 2: Time is money

As every engineer knows: Power=Work/Time

Since: Knowledge=Power

and: Time=Money

by substitution we have: Knowledge=Work/Money

Solving for Money, we get: Money=Work/Knowledge

Thus, as Knowledge approaches zero, Money approaches infinity, regardless of the amount of work done.

CONCLUSION: The less you know, the more you make.


and how about one to prove that we are all goats

The Logical Proof

The proposition "Everything is a Goat" is either true or not true.
If it is false, then it's opposite must be true.
The opposite of "everything" is "nothing", which give us the proposition "Nothing is a Goat".*
Now, this statement is clearly false, for goats certainly exist - we have all seen them. This means that it's opposite must be true.
Therefore, "Everything is a Goat" must be a true statement.

PS. This relies on propositional logic eg. any statement is either true or false and if proven false, then the opposite statement must be true, for example, the statement "It is raining outside", either it is or it is not.

Makes you think huh?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by jimmy p
This means that it's opposite must be true.
no it doesn't.
 
We are using propositional logic according to which the opposite of a false statement is a true one and vice versa :smile:
 
Dont try and have a discussion with him jimmy, he's nuts.
 
Originally posted by Andy
Dont try and have a discussion with him jimmy, he's nuts.
??
 
Originally posted by jimmy p
We are using propositional logic according to which the opposite of a false statement is a true one and vice versa :smile:

point taken :)
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top