Proving When a Tensor is 0: M \cong M \otimes K

  • Thread starter Thread starter Site
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Site
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Let M be a module over the commutative ring K with unit 1. I want to prove that M \cong M \otimes K. Define \phi:M \rightarrow M \otimes K by \phi(m)=m \otimes 1. This is a morphism because the tensor product is K-linear in the first slot. It is also easy to show that the map is surjective. This is where I get stuck.

Suppose \phi(m)=\phi(n), so that 0 = m \otimes 1 - n \otimes 1 = (m-n) \otimes 1. How do I prove that this implies that m=n and thus the map is injective? More generally, how can you tell when a tensor is 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the universal property to find an explicit inverse.
 
Thanks, micromass! I think I've got it. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know if this looks alright.

Define h: M \times K \rightarrow M by h(m,k)=mk. This map is bilinear, so it factors through the tensor map M \times K \rightarrow M \otimes K. Thus there is a unique (irrelevant?) morphism f such that f(m \otimes k)=mk. This is the right and left inverse of the morphism \phi, implying that \phi is an isomorphism.
 
That looks alright! The uniqueness of the map is indeed irrelevant here, but it's nice to know.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top