PSAT abstract inequality question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a PSAT abstract inequality question involving the relationships p<q, r<s, and r<q. Participants analyze whether the statements I (p<s), II (s<q), and III (r<p) must be true based on the given inequalities. By visualizing the relationships on a number line, they conclude that none of the statements are necessarily true, as scenarios can be constructed where the conditions do not hold. The consensus is that the inequalities do not guarantee any of the proposed statements. Thus, the final conclusion is that none of the statements must be true.
ElijahRockers
Gold Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
10
p<q, r<s, and r<q.

Which of the following statements must be true?

I. p<s
II. s<q
III. r<p

The correct answer could be either one statement, a combination of statements, or none of the statements. Came across this question while helping some high school students prepare for their SATs and I'm embarassed to say it stumped me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing an unlabelled number line, and place 4 points on the line. For the first, p<s, let's assume that p>s. Since for the first two criteria p<q and r<s, this means that the only way the order can fit is if it's r,s,p,q, and since the last criteria r<q holds as well, that means we've found a scenario where p is not less than s, so I. is not necessarily true.
 
Yea, I pretty much came to the conclusion that none of the three statements are necessarily true.
 
Yep, precisely.
 
Back
Top