Pull force of magnet calculated at an angle

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the pull force between magnets is typically done at a perpendicular angle, but the force required to separate magnets can change when applied at different angles. The discussion explores how to adjust the pull force calculation using the cosine of the angle from the perpendicular. It highlights that at a 90-degree angle, the force theoretically becomes zero due to the nature of magnetic forces, which are influenced by the movement of charges. The conversation also touches on the complexities of calculating forces on different faces of a cuboid magnet and suggests that the force difference between pulling and shearing may not be significant. Overall, understanding the angle's impact on magnetic pull force requires careful consideration of the geometry and physics involved.
Mozez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi PF,

A disclaimer, I am no good at Physics or math.

My question:

When calculating the pull force between two magnets it seems to always be calculated at an angle perpendicular to the surface of the magnet.

I was wondering what effect on the force required to "pull" one magnet away from the other would be when a force is applied at a different angle and can this be calculated easier when you already know the pull force at the perpendicular?

I guess I am looking for a way of recalculating the force needed to 'pull' a magnet away from another when the angle of the applied force changes.

Thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force_at_angle = cos (angle_from_perpendicular) * Force_at_peroendicular
 
Thank you for replying.

Wouldn't this imply that at 90 degrees to the perpendicular that there is no force required to pull the magnet seeing as cos(90) = 0?

Unless you mean angle_from_perpendicular in radians? But then the resulting force needed is only minutely different. Maybe this is the case? That the force difference between shearing a magnet away from another or pulling perpendicular are roughly the same? It doesn't seem to be so though.

I obviously still need a bit of guidance on this.

Thanks
 
Good point. This is because at 90 degree's the magnetic force is from a different part of the magnet.

Magnetic forces are caused by moving charges (generally electrons) in the plane perpindicular to their travel. A moving charge does not create a magnetic force perpendicular to this, i.e. in its direction of travel.

Now a magnet is like a closed electric circuit, with electrons moving round the outside. If you put the north of the magnet facing upwards the electrons are moving round it in the clockwise direction.

So let's go for a cuboid magnet for my simplicity. I'm going to ignore the N and S end bits. But let's say its a cuboid with faces f1,f2,f3,f4 and areas a1,a2,a3,a4 and such that a1=a3 and a2=a4, i.e. these are opposite faces. Since its a cuboid all these faces will have the same height but different width.

If we know the force when perpindicular to one face (say f1, call this force F) and we want to know it when we move it around angle theta from the perpindicular. It would be:

F*cos(theta)+(a2/a1)*F*sin(theta)

Just to let you know this is just me thinking aloud, I'm always doing magnetic forces from currents or electrons, not bar magnets. A better resource might be:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_between_magnets#Calculating_the_magnetic_force
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top