Pull-off force: hose, pipe, clamp

AI Thread Summary
A recent study tested the pull-off force of a hose and pipe connection at a 10% reduction in clamp torque, revealing negligible changes in results. The discussion highlights concerns that higher torque might deform the soft plastic pipe, reducing friction between the hose and pipe. However, it is noted that minimal initial clamping is sufficient to initiate positive feedback, and excessive torque is unnecessary. The assembly differs from previous studies by focusing on clamp torque rather than position and involves a plastic pipe without grooves. Overall, the findings suggest that effective clamping is crucial to prevent fluid penetration without needing excessive torque.
jbenedet
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Was surprised by a study recently where we tested 6 samples for pull-off force at a 10% reduction in clamp Torque and noticed negligible shift in results. Is it possible that at higher torque the clamp is deforming the pipe, reducing the surface contact (friction) between the hose and pipe?

The pipe is a soft plastic, the hose is rubber, the clamp is steel. The pipe is inserted into the hose and a clamp is torqued down over the connection.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It’s similar but different. This is a study focused on the torque of the clamp. The other was for clamp position. This assembly also has no groove unlike the other example and is a plastic pipe, instead of a steel pipe. I am being careful not to provide proprietary information while still including enough info to work through the concept. Also, the community provided good ideas/brainstorming based on the info I provided previously. It was helpful. Thanks.
 
jbenedet said:
It’s similar but different. This is a study focused on the torque of the clamp. The other was for clamp position. This assembly also has no groove unlike the other example and is a plastic pipe, instead of a steel pipe. I am being careful not to provide proprietary information while still including enough info to work through the concept. Also, the community provided good ideas/brainstorming based on the info I provided previously. It was helpful. Thanks.
Do your managers know that you are having to resort to Internet forums to do your proprietary work? Are you working as an ME?
 
berkeman said:
Do your managers know that you are having to resort to Internet forums to do your proprietary work? Are you working as an ME?
This is so incredibly out of line it’s ridiculous. I’m not “resorting” to anything. I’m thinking about this because I enjoy it, not because I can’t get my work done.
 
It is often the case that you can more easily push a hose on, or off a pipe, but you cannot pull it off. When you pull on a hose, the tension causes the hose becomes slightly longer, while the diameter of the hose is reduced. The surface area of the hose effectively remains constant. That is the source of the positive feedback.

The hose must be clamped sufficiently to the pipe, that the internal fluid under pressure, does not penetrate between the pipe and the hose, under the band of the clamp.

jbenedet said:
Is it possible that at higher torque the clamp is deforming the pipe, reducing the surface contact (friction) between the hose and pipe?
No.
Very little initial clamping is necessary to start the positive feedback multiplication. Once the clamp is snug, additional clamping will be unnecessary.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top