Pulley system with one mass and apparently independent forces?

AI Thread Summary
The gym's cable machine demonstrates an interesting mechanical setup where pulling on one cable lifts a specific mass with a consistent force. When both cables are pulled simultaneously, the mass remains the same, yet each cable still requires the same force to operate. This suggests that the system is designed to distribute the load evenly, allowing for the same force exertion regardless of how many cables are engaged. The user experiences no increase in resistance when releasing one cable, challenging typical expectations of weight lifting mechanics. This design highlights the unique properties of pulley systems and their ability to maintain force requirements across multiple points of operation.
Maurice7510
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
So at my gym, there's a cable machine that works like this: You pull on one cable and you lift x mass using y force. You pull the other and find the same thing. If, however, you pull on both, you're still only lifting x mass (you can see the weights) yet somehow each cable is still requiring y force. I actually held ~80lbs in both arms, and then released one. Intuitively, I should then be resisting 160lbs with one arm, which aside from being well beyond my ability, should have at least been noticeable. Yet I found no noticeable difference at all.
I was just wondering how a system could be set up to allow for this kind of thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maurice7510 said:
You pull on one cable and you lift x mass using y force. You pull the other and find the same thing. If, however, you pull on both, you're still only lifting x mass (you can see the weights) yet somehow each cable is still requiring y force.

See the pulley on the right:



The forces in the cables are equal, and stay the same no matter if you pull one of them or both.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top