Pulleys & Forces Homework: Struggling to Understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter FeelTheFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between the movements of two masses connected by a pulley system, specifically that m2 moves twice the distance of m1. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams to visualize the forces and displacements involved. The mathematical relationship is established by differentiating the displacement relationship to derive corresponding velocity and acceleration relationships. A key insight shared is that once the displacement relationship is fixed, it dictates the ratios for velocity and acceleration as well. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear diagrams and a solid grasp of the mechanics involved in pulley systems.
FeelTheFire
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Pulleys.png


Hey guys I'm really having problems understanding this despite looking at the solution, which is fully laid out here: http://iweb.tntech.edu/murdock/books/v1chap4.pdf

I know that m2 moves twice the distance that m1 moves. I have tried looking at each rope as a length that doesn't change made up of intervals that do change. I keep hitting a wall trying to come to the conclusion that 2a1 = a2.

I am doing pretty good understanding net forces, but this absolutely throws me for a loop. Any insight would be terrific.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you should always do in a mechanics problem is to draw a free body diagram for each mass. Your insight may show itself there.
 
Imagine that there are measurement rules positioned beside each mass for determining their positions and arranged so that at some given instant they both read zero (so they're synchronized). When the m1 rule reads some value, the other rule reads twice that. So the readings are related: x2 = 2x1. Differentiate both sides to find the velocity relationship. Differentiate again to find the acceleration relationship.

The thing is, once a displacement relationship is fixed it fixed the velocity and acceleration relationships with the same ratio. This applies anytime there are related rates.
 
Legaldose said:
The first thing you should always do in a mechanics problem is to draw a free body diagram for each mass. Your insight may show itself there.

Thanks for the reply. I have drawn a FBD for both pullies and both masses. Attached is as far as I got with what they tell me. *Edit* The m2g in the lower right corner should read m1g. My mistake.Gneill,
Thanks for the reply. The problem is I can't even get to that point. I only know that m2 moves twice as far as m1 because I looked at the solution. I can't, in mathematical terms, come to the conclusion that it displaces twice as far. I tried calling each length of rope it's own distance, with each changing but their sums always adding to the same number since the total rope length doesn't change. The problem I ran into was I kept getting circular answers, for instance Rope 1 length = Rope 1 length.
 

Attachments

  • FBD's.png
    FBD's.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 486
Last edited:
You just need to make more diagrams until you can picture what's happening. Suppose a pulley is supported by a loop of rope, one end tied to the ceiling and the other passes though a hole in the ceiling. Now imagine lifting the pulley out of its rope cradle by some unit distance. How much rope "slack" would you have to pull through the hole in the ceiling to get the rope seated against the pulley again?

attachment.php?attachmentid=62788&stc=1&d=1381550422.gif


You should be able to see that there are two units of slack that must be gathered in in order to re-seat the pulley. So the pulley moves 1 unit, the rope moves 2 units.

This is the same situation as with your pulley setup. The wheel of the pulley is displaced by half the amount of the rope end moves, or conversely, the rope moves twice as far as the pulley moves.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    15.4 KB · Views: 714
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
97
Views
16K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top