LCSphysicist said:
Hey, could you expand your method of solving? My method was correct, but a little tiring.
I see your constraints, what are the directions you adopt?
I found
ar = acm + am
i am not sure about the signals, actually who see my questions,can see that this is about 90% the responsible by the problem i have in exercises
Signs must be the biggest single cause of errors. Generally I recommend sticking to standard conventions like up, to the right and anticlockwise are positive, but when it is clear that a particular variable will turn out negative under that arrangement it can be less confusing to adopt a convention that makes each variable positive.
Whatever you choose, write it down!
In the present case, with the orthodox convention, and writing a for the particle's acceleration, we can anticipate that a will turn out negative:
Torques about cylinder’s centre: ##-(T+ma)r=\frac 12 mr^2\alpha##.
Straight away that looks weird. Why T+ma?
Since particle m accelerates at a to the right there must be a right-positive force ma acting on it. Therefore there is a right-positive force -ma acting on the bottom of the diagram of the cylinder. This exerts an anticlockwise-positive torque -mar on the cylinder. Since T exerts an anticlockwise-positive torque -Tr, the sum is -(T+ma)r.
The rightward acceleration of the cylinder is ##a-r\alpha##. Again, we can predict the rotation will be clockwise, so ##\alpha## will be negative.
So for the linear acceleration of the system, ##T=ma+m(a-r\alpha)##.
These lead to ##a=-\frac T{4m}##.
With the "positive variables" convention, it is all the same but flipping the signs of a and ##\alpha##.
So how to check that your signs are right?
One test is to consider how the result changes as a certain variable increases or decreases in magnitude. You can apply this to each equation.