Does Pushing a Pram Burn More Calories Than Walking Alone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrmooo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
Walking while pushing a pram burns more calories than walking without one due to the additional weight. Factors such as speed, inclination, and friction must be considered to accurately calculate calorie expenditure. The formula for this calculation involves the power consumption, human efficiency, speed, and the force of friction. As speed increases, air resistance can also affect the energy required. Understanding these variables is essential for determining the true caloric burn when pushing a pram.
mrmooo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there
I have a bit of an stupid question for you, I'm not a physics buff so please go easy on me.

I have been talking to a friend who has had a baby and she claims walking pushing a pram or walking without a pram burn the same amount of calories which I guess is very wrong... however I can't really tell her how pushing an extra weight (the weight of the baby and the pram itself) impacts the workout

I guess speed and inclination have to be taken into account

so here is my question, is there anyone who would be able to give me the ultimate formula to calculate calories burnt by pushing a pram say walking at 3mph keeping in mind variable speed and inclination?

thank you so much for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrmooo said:
so here is my question, is there anyone who would be able to give me the ultimate formula to calculate calories burnt by pushing a pram say walking at 3mph keeping in mind variable speed and inclination?
Not unless you can tell us what friction force there is for this pram and how efficient the human body is. Friction should be constant at 3mph but as it goes faster it may also increase as the speed increases due to air resistance, depending on its shape. That is something you would have to measure.

But then you would have to factor in what energy input is required to produce the energy required to maintain that additional output of mechanical energy.

The formula would be: Fv = ηP were P is the power consumption, η is the efficiency of the human body in converting food energy into mechanical work, v is the speed and F is the force of friction - ie the force required to maintain a constant speed for the pram.

AM
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top