Pushing with a lorentz contracting stick

  • Thread starter Thread starter jartsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz
jartsa
Messages
1,582
Reaction score
141
Let's say I'm pushing and accelerating an object using a long stick, like this:

H--------------O
-->

H is my hand, O is the object.

The force I use is F, the distance I push is s, the energy I use is Fs

The force pushing the object <= F
The distance that the object is pushed < s

So energy increase of the object < Fs

Is conservation of energy violated here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Energy is different in different frames, but it is conserved in each. Conservation and invariance are separate concepts.
 
DaleSpam said:
No. Energy is different in different frames, but it is conserved in each. Conservation and invariance are separate concepts.

You answered some other question. This question was about energy at different ends of a stick. Energy of push.

We know a force meter shows a smaller reading at the other end of the stick, because an accelerometer shows smaller reading at the nose of an accelerating rocket.

And we know the hand moves a longer distance compared to the other end of the stick.

So force times distance is smaller at the object side of the stick.
 
jartsa said:
You answered some other question. This question was about energy at different ends of a stick. Energy of push.
Oh, I misunderstood the question, apologies.

That is a much more difficult question to answer. Depending on the exact details of the motion and the material properties of the stick there are several things to consider. First, the pure kinematics makes it so that the KE is higher than you would get classically (i.e. in Newtonian physics the limit of KE as v→c is finite but in SR it is infinite). Second, the rod itself has KE. Third, the rod may be compressed by the push, in which case the rod also stores elastic PE.

If you carefully account for all the types of energy then you will get conservation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top