Put in order from most to least important (easy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter xdeanna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Important
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on ranking six medical and scientific advancements based on their impact on modern life. Participants emphasize that the definitions of "impact" and "modern life" are subjective and can vary widely. One ranking suggests that penicillin/antibiotics have the most significant impact, followed by the birth control pill, GM foods, anesthesia, coronary bypass surgery, and the human genome project. The birth control pill is highlighted for its transformative effect on women's roles in society, while GM foods are considered less impactful due to their limited adoption globally. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexity of measuring the importance of these advancements in contemporary society.
xdeanna
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
rank these, 1- the most impact or importance and 6- the least impact on modern life.

Anesthesia
Penicillin/Antibiotics
GM Foods
Birth control pill
Coronary by-pass surgery
Human genome project

what do u think? there is no correct answer...just curious to see what others say.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define impact, define modern life. A lot depends on what you mean by these two.
 
its not that complicated..by the most impact i mean which of them has affected us the most..can be a negative or positive impact, and by modern life i mean life today, not in the past, not in the future.
like i said, there is no right answer as long as you can argue why you chose that order, but I am not asking for all that..just simply rank them.

how i ranked them:
1) Penicillin/Antibiotics
2) Birth control pill
3) GM Foods
4) Anesthesia
5) Coronary by-pass surgery
6) Human genome project
 
I would push birth control pill up and GM Foods down. I don't have hard numbers, but I think on the global scale GM crops are still only small part of the total. Birth control pill is responsible for putting old social system on its head, woman role in society was completely different 50 years ago than it is now.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
11K
Back
Top